The first book in Ms. Kuzniar Clark’s non-fiction tetralogy is the story of Gustav Sabac el Cher. Gustav, a black man with a gift for discipline and music, grew up in Königsberg and became “the only black bandmaster of the German Army.”
This fact-filled story takes the reader back in time, over 150 years ago. There we meet the controversial Prussian Prince Albrecht, getting to know him via his travel adventures, as well as in war. Prince Albrecht brought many things from Arabia back to Prussia, one of which was a ‘human gift’ from the Egyptian Viceroy Muhammad Ali: a seven-year-old dark-skinned boy. He was given the name August Albrecht Sabac el Cher and accompanied the Prince from that point on.
The social climate of the Prussian state of the 40s and 50s was one of curiosity towards “others,” not hostility. August’s dark skin greatly benefited him, in fact. His career at Court flourished.
In 1867, he married a German woman, Anna Maria Jung, the daughter of a Berlin clothesmaker. While the happy couple lived relatively trouble free in Germany, their two children, Gustav and Elise, were dealt a different fate, as were their children who came of age in NAZI GERMANY.
Utilizing photos, records, and eyewitness accounts, this wonderful little book paints a comprehensive picture of the whole family. One learns, for example, that Gustav’s sons, Herbert and Horst, were deeply loved by all. Both mastered music early on and both pursued professional careers. While Herbert continued in this vein with measurable success, Horst was not so fortunate. In 1943 he was drafted as a Wehrmacht medic!
You’ll have to read the book to find out what happened…
Allow Mr. Vincent and me to introduce Wilk Mocy Publishers’ newest podcast!!
A few words before you listen…
John and I are aware of the echo issue. At the moment, owing to budgetary challenges, this technical issue cannot be helped. We will be acquiring better microphones and recording software, but my screen recorder software must suffice until we can purchase the improved software. Please, bear with us in the meantime.
As for content, the end goal of this podcast is to make World War II and its repercussions relevant to today’s politics and social discourse. It already is relevant, but our goal is to explain how and why that is. We both love history and we both follow current events and politics closely, so we are combining the two to bring you a unique podcast that no one else can.
In this regard, I want listeners and fans to be fully informed as to our position historically and politically. John and I are both mediators by nature. We tend to resist cult mentality and identity politics; though, we both understand and/or sympathize with some Identitarian ideas and movements (e.g., the Alt-Right, Zionism, Alt-Reich, White Nationalism, BLM, etc.) At the same time, we both understand the Left, and neither of us is racist. As such, we offer a distinctive viewpoint that is partial to and understanding of both sides of the political spectrum.
What’s more, we make Third Reich history — including its lead-up and aftermath — applicable to both sides, so that both sides are armed with the unbiased truth about said history (i.e., #Real3R). Too many people on both sides of the spectrum entertain a Hollywood version of this history, a distortion which threatens the freedoms of both sides in a very real way. The recent chaos in Charlottesville, VA is case in point. What happened there has as much to do with World War II and its aftermath as it does today’s immigration dialectic.
With that out of the way, please take a look at our About page to learn more about who we are and what we’re about.
Thank you & enjoy!
Please consider supporting us with just a dollar or more per month.
Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source. There, I said it. And I’m not just saying this to evoke a reaction. I’m saying it because I really mean it. The renowned “Hitler expert” Lord Dacre, better known as Hugh Trevor-Roper, knowingly and willingly engaged in a massive cover-up regarding Hitler’s Table Talk (hereafter TT).
Had it not been for the outstanding research at the low cost of just $50 taken up by historian Richard Carrier, we might still be in the dark about this, 64 years after TT’s first appearance in the English language. Sorry to bust this bubble, Hitler and Third Reich enthusiasts, but TT is worthless.
In this article, I establish three things: 1) that Hugh Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in academic fraud for profit and prestige, 2) that TT is a worthless primary source, and 3) that renowned Hitler “experts”, both Revisionist and Mainstream, have failed the public regarding reliable Hitler primary sources.
A fake Hitler quote cited by Irmin Vinson on Greg Johnson’s Counter-Currents website:
#1 NEW RELEASE ON AMAZON IN “HISTORIOGRAPHY” (7/2-7/3/17 & 7/14/17)
**6/24 UPDATE** The text comparisons have commenced on my end and the results are stunning!
First, we have here Henry Picker’s December 13, 1941 entry (based on the “original” notes of Heinrich Heim before he [Heim] modified and expanded them[!!; op. cit. Nilsson]):
Henry Picker on December 13, 1941 (mittags):
“Es ist gut, dass ich die Pfaffen nicht hineingelassen habe in die Partei. Am 21. März 1933 – Potsdam – war die Frage: Kirche oder nicht Kirche? Ich hatte den Staat gegen den Fluch der beiden Konfessionen erodbert. Wenn ich damals angefangen hätte, mich der Kirche zu bedienen – wir sind an die Gräber gegangen, während die Männer des Staates in der Kirche waren–, so wurde ich heute das Schicksal des Duce teilen. Für sich ist er ein Freigeist. Aber er hat mit Konzessionen begonnen… Ich wurde im Vatikan einmarschieren und die ganze Gesellschaft herausholen. Ich würde dann sagen: “Verzeihung, ich habe mich geirrt!” – Aber sie wären weg!”
“It is good that I did not let priests into the party. On 21 March 1933 – Potsdam – the question was: Church or no church? I had conquered the state despite the curse of the two confessions. If I had begun to serve the church — we went to the graves, while the men of the state were in the church — I would now be sharing the fate of the Duce. He is a free-thinker. But he has initiated [begun with] concessions … I would enter the Vatican and throw the whole lot of them out. I’d say, “Excuse me, I’ve been wrong!” – But they would [already] have been out [gone]!”
Source and original entry (13 December 1941, mittags):
Next, we have Heinrich Heim’s modified and expanded version of his own notes purportedly taken down on December 13, 1941 (mittags), which were (unbeknown to Heim) hijacked by Mr. Picker and published as his own in the book above! (We have Mr. Picker to thank for inadvertently exposing Heim as a fabricator in this respect; op. cit. Carrier)
Heim’s modified entry for the same day of 13 December 1941 (mittags):
And the softcover English translation, which, like Heim, adds much content to the original one paragraph entry:
And then we have the following divergent notes from Werner Koeppen, who John Toland (on p. 682 in https://www.amazon.com/dp/0385420536) wrote had “furtively jotted down notes” on a paper napkin as Hitler spoke. Well, if Koeppen furtively jotted notes, then how come he had so much less content than Heim (above) and such different content than both Picker and Heim?
Some of Koeppen’s 9/18/1941 notes (my translation):
Little of Koeppen’s content matches Heim’s. It should match Heim’s entry more closely as far as theme and subject matter if both men furtively took verbatim notes as Hitler spoke to them. In fact, they ought to be identical. But the very different content suggests a lot of omission and divergence on both men’s parts. Not okay for a steno reporter! The only thing we can say for sure after comparing Koeppen’s September 17th (not posted here, but is in my book) through 18th entries is that a general discussion of the eastern front and Reichskommissariat Ukraine took place. Nothing more. We have no idea what Hitler actually said or did not say. The entries agree only in the most general sense. (E.g., Heim features Hitler calling the Slavs “a mass of born slaves” and Koeppen does not.)
Here is Heim’s entry for that day (September 17th to the 18th):
Lastly, the entry of January 18, 1942 (nachts) suffices as the final blow to Heim’s credibility as a reliable steno reporter. Compare Mr. Picker’s hijacked Heim notes with those later expanded and amended by Heim (unbeknown to Picker).
Picker’s hijacked Heim entry (18. Januar 1942, nachts):
Heim’s entry for the exact same time/day (18./19. Januar 1942, nachts):
All updates and textual comparisons have been added to my book.
In this remarkable discussion, Military Historian Veronica K. Clark dissects and analyzes one of history’s most ill-reputed false flags – the Reichstag fire of 27 February 1933. Did the NSDAP orchestrate this fire or did they simply take advantage of a young communist’s crime?
This review is from: Triumph of Diversity: A New Look at Hitler’s Armed Forces (Wehrwolf, 1) (Paperback)
I haven’t read this book, but there’s apparently a small cottage industry of books with a “Rainbow Reich” angle. You see, the Nazis weren’t really Aryan supremacists, but…multi-culturalists! Could you run that through me again, please, Herr Standartenführer?
**February 2017 update** Apparently, this troll edited his/her review to get it re-posted on Amazon. Amazon had removed it because Ashtar never even read the book. Not to mention, this book was out of print in 2010 and completely sold out and unavailable (unless used) by 2012. Epic fail, Ashtar.
It’s ironic that some Neo-Nazis actually paint the Reich in rainbow colors, a bit like the Neo-Confederates who claim that the South was multi-culturalist, while the Union was racist. These guys don’t seem to realize that they are confirming the dominance and victory of liberal multi-culturalism by their idiotic attempts to mimic it. As long as books like this get a hearing, me and the rest of my ZOG friends can sleep in peace.