Tag Archives: Powerwolf Publications

The Hitler Worship Cult – Audio Book Now Available!

GET YOUR COPY ON AMAZON TODAY: https://amazon.com/dp/B077ZFSYHD/

On Amazon (1st ed. softcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1533074763/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Mixed-Race Germans: Nordicism Discredited

This excerpt from Nation & Race is Copyright©2014-2017 Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Get this book on Amazon today (2nd ed.): https://amazon.com/Nation-Race-Warwolves-Iron-Cross/dp/1517253322

First ed.: https://amazon.com/Warwolves-Iron-Cross-Nation-Wehrwolf/dp/1507845995


ALBRECHT WIRTH WAS AMONG those who detailed Germans’ multiraciality. He argued that Germans were originally composed of “Celtic, Lithuanian, Germanic and Slavic blood, then Romans, Jews, Huguenots and Italians, with a smattering of Swedes, Scots, Croats, Irish, Hungarians, Spaniards and Turks.”[1] Was this hybridity the reason for Germany having been so deeply divided for so long? For Germany having no single economic, cultural or political center until the advent of National Socialism?

Hutton suggests that in order to successfully overcome these divisions, an “operational conception” of Germanness had to be adopted by the Nazis. What Hitler came up with was nothing short of brilliant: we must recognize the importance of race as it relates to the German people, and secondly, we must acknowledge the presence of the Aryan which unites us all in a common bond. This operational definition of Germanness was initially workable, but over time it faced serious challenges to its validity and applicability. The Aryan concept yielded to the Nordic concept which then gave way to the more inclusive German-blooded concept. Hitler’s main concern was the creation of a Party and accompanying doctrine that could rival Marxism in its influence and ability to unite. This is why there was initially little tolerance for varied viewpoints. No movement was going to break Marxism’s appeal unless it was as intolerant and dogmatic as Marxism: hence the Aryan-Nordic cultism of the early NSDAP.


We will now delve further into the academic tensions of Third Reich racial discourse: for example, the battle between racial anthropologists and linguists. The problem with the linguistic approach to defining the German Volk was that it allowed inclusion of aliens whom were racially too far removed from the Germans, so much so that their inclusion would probably not result in harmonious assimilation and acculturation. These racial aliens were almost always Negroes, Jews and Gypsies. In addition, German racial anthropologists had a point when they declared that no one could mistake a Mongol for a black man or a Chinese man for a white man. The differences were apparent. What the racial anthropologists struggled with was defining the German in positive terms. How were they to differentiate Germans from the Jews living among them, for example? This difficult task of racial differentiation, which was ultimately biopsychosocial, is what led to the Nuremberg Laws. The only way to determine what was German was to exclude what was obviously or reasonably not German. In application, this meant exclusion of the majority of black Germans, Gypsies and Jews from Germanhood.

Contrary to NS propaganda, Nazi theorists, like most mainstream intellectuals at that time, acknowledged the mixed-race state of the German people. The central problem they dealt with was not determining what constituted the German race (deutsche Rasse) – a term that was rejected by the majority of German academicians and politicians alike – but which races made up the German Volk and which should be allowed to continue to infuse new blood into this Volk. Most Nazi theorists argued that the Germans were composed of some six different races and that some of these races created harmonious mixtures that surpassed the achievement and cultural levels of the two original stocks from whence they were derived.

One example that was frequently cited as superior to the Nordic element by itself was the Nordic-Alpine hybrid. Ernst Kretschmer said that while these two race cores were very different, they nevertheless mixed harmoniously. According to Max Gerstenhauer, the Alpine race resulted from “pure” Germanics interbreeding with the indigenous slaves. He did not view this mixing kindly and asserted that Germans had lost “racial quality” as a result. Gerstenhauer was ostensibly dismayed by the fact that the German Volk was only 2/3 Germanic; the other 1/3 consisted of Alpine non-Germanics. Juxtaposed to this trajectory was the thesis of Walter Goetz, who argued that “racial mixing was a prerequisite for the greatest human achievements.”[2] Hermann Muckermann avowed that “the contribution of the Nordic race was at its greatest where it had mixed in a harmonious way with other compatible racial groups,” such as the Dinaric, Alpine and Phalian races. Robert Gradmann argued that the Nordic-East Baltic mixture of northern Europe resulted in the blond-haired population there. Eugen Fischer suggested that the German Volkhad benefited” from the different European peoples mixing with one another. Fischer also avered that “…many of the great Germans had come from racially mixed areas of Germany, [and] that the Nordic race in its pure state had not achieved as much as in a mixed state. There were examples of gifted Mischlinge, such as Pushkin [part-black] and Booker T. Washington [also part black].” He therefore concluded that the Germans were fortunate to have benefited from the Nordic race, but “also from the other racial elements…” Wilhelm Schmidt asserted that race-mixing between the Hamitic and Nordic peoples “gave the Nordic race its special advantage, giving it both its conquering attributes, and, to a lesser degree, the artistic gifts of totemistic town-dwellers, as well as in a great measure the thoroughness, seriousness and conscientiousness of the matriarchal agricultural people.”[3] In addition, Schmidt argued that the Nordic race’s oldest links “stretched deep into Africa and Asia.” If accurate, this negates the argument that the Nordics were “racially pure” and that Scandinavia was their birthplace as a race. Hans Günther regularly depicted the Alpine race as the “ugliest” in his various publications. In an attack on Günther, race dynamic theorist Friedrich Merkenschlager stated that southern Germans bore “up to 80 per cent ‘yellow blood’ from the Mongol race.”[4] Otto Hauser wrote that the Alpine was the result of the Nordic race crossing with the Polar (yellow) race. Furthermore, he claimed that the Mediterranean race was the result of the Negro mixing with the Nordic. If correct, this means that a “bastardized, negrified” race surpassed the civilizational level of the “pure Nordics” in Scandinavia. Classical Greece and Rome were both Mediterranean products, not Nordo-Scandinavian products.


In the end the Nordicists were not only forced to come to terms with racial mixing, but they also conceded that the Nordic race was “frequently understood as related to, or hybridized with, the Phalian race.”[5] Notions of race purity were irretrievably out the door. (As an aside, “even the most liberal lines of racial anthropology were unable to distance themselves from the notion that the ‘Negro’ was essentially inferior. This assumption was built into the foundations of that academic science from the very beginning.”[6])

Another important thing to understand about this time period is that German academics and policymakers were worried about the fall of German civilization. Since Darwin’s evolutionary theory was taken so seriously in Germany, intellectuals feared that German civilization was doomed to collapse like all the great civilations before it. And of course with that collapse would go the German Volk. But the perceived ability to reverse Germandom’s decay and eventual collapse into oblivion via eugenics rekindled these racial pessimists’ hopes. Eugenics was one tool among several that offered a solution to Germany’s racio-cultural quandary. If only the best Germans were permitted to have children, then much of Germany’s degeneration could be halted and even reversed. The Nordicists saw in eugenics the promise of re-breeding a Nordo-German upper class which could then rule over all the “bastardized” and “racially degenerated” masses of Germans, eventually improving the German people overall. Fortunately such wild breeding schemes were never realized under the Nazi government and as a matter of fact Walter Schultze

stressed that there was no programme to ‘breed’ an ideal tall, narrow-faced, blue-eyed, blond type; no hereditarily healthy member of the German Volk should feel second-class or inferior on account of lacking these features. It was the psychology, the morality, the personality of the individual that counted, and the inheritance of external physical characteristics was a matter of secondary importance. The idea that racial policies took as their ideal a particular physical type was misinformation spread by the enemies of National Socialism.”[7]

The real threat to the German Volk was not the Jews per se, but “the losses of territory and vitality, rising assimilation into other nations [such as America] and the lack of internal unity.” Georg Schmidt-Rohr, a theorist who came under official fire but was later rehabilitated by the Race Policy Office in 1939, argued that “[t]hese problems could not be solved by persecuting Jews as an outlet for the embittered discontent of the masses: cheap anti-Semitism was no solution.”[8] Rohr stressed the importance of the German language in maintaining German identity worldwide. If Germans began speaking English, Spanish, etc., then they would slowly lose their attachment to their Germanness. And that is in fact what happened to many a German before, during and after World War II. Germans abroad were amongst the most numerous and unswerving enemies of the Reich, whether they were Polish, British or American. Himmler even remarked on this problem of ‘lost Germans’ in his Top Secret Posen speech of 24 October 1943 (see hitler & himmler UNCENSORED).

Jewish International vs. Nordic International

Perhaps even more interesting than Clauss’s insights was the idea that the Nordic race component was at war with the Jewish race component. The two were seen by certain Nordicists as twins, one good and one evil, and these twins were vying for world domination. There was in fact a “curious, half-repressed racial link” shared between the Jews and the Germans, as both “shared a partial origin in the Near Eastern race.”[18] But there was a fundamental difference between these two twins that made the Jew the stronger and more influential: the Jewish twin required no physical territory to thrive and in fact flourished in modernity and the urban realm. The Jewish twin could claim his written history (the Talmud and Torah) as the basis of his collective identity, so there was no need for a territorial one. The Nordic twin, on the other hand, had no recorded history with which to identify and was therefore only at home when he was tied to his land, nature and a rural existence. He could not contend with modernity and in fact went wayward when exposed to such a context. What’s more, the Jewish twin existed equally well as a pure race and as a mixed-race; the Nordic no longer had a pure form and his existence was altogether dependent on the Völker that still bore his blood. To make matters worse for the Nordic twin, his traits seemed to diminish when he mixed with other races whereas the Jewish twin’s traits dominated when he mixed. The Nordic was the frail dying twin, the Jew the robust thriving twin. It was this metaphysical backdrop that set the stage for the intellectual racialist trajectory that the Nordic International was at war with, and simply must triumph over, the degenerative Jewish International. The very existence of the German Volk depended on a Nordic International victory. All would be lost if the Jew triumphed, hence the desire to Nordify the German people who would otherwise continue to be Judaized. Since few Nazi theorists were able to completely disavow this intellectual milieu, Nordicism was able to hang on almost to the bitter end. Even rational Hitler hints at this raciospiritual war in his Platterhof speech.

[1] Christopher M. Hutton, Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Dialectic of Volk (Malden: MA: Polity Press), p. 20.

[2] Ibid., p. 127.

[3] Ibid., p. 120.

[4] Ibid., p. 151.

[5] Ibid., p. 139.

[6] Ibid., p. 25.

[7] Ibid., p. 163.

[8] Ibid., p. 141.

[9 through 17 not included in this excerpt]

[18] Ibid., p. 60.

The Hitler Worship Cult: Distortion, Justification & Mythmaking

The following is a synopsis of my new book,  The Hitler Worship Cult: Distortion, Justification & Mythmaking. This book relies heavily on the research of my Wilk Mocy colleague, Miss Kuzniar Clark. We both hope that this will be the controversial, breakthrough book that finally puts Neorevisionism on the map. It is, as I like to say, ruthlessly factual.

If you run askew of the Hitler Worship Cult, they will scream “shill”, “multiculturalist”, “Jew”, “agent” and hundreds more blasphemous epithets, meanwhile trolling you into oblivion. Who are they? What are they? And why are they misusing historical revisionism to push forth their agenda to Hitlerize the minds of us all?

The Hitler Worship Cult makes excuses for every single thing Hitler did. He could do no wrong, no matter what. Any attempt at honesty about Hitler makes the cult fly into a frothing frenzy. The goal of the cult is not to paint a true portrait of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist movement.

Their goal does not include safeguarding us from Hitler’s wrongs. On the contrary, their goal is to bring back National Socialism exactly as the mainstream media portrays it: racist, supremacist, arrogant, imperialist, genocidal, and totalitarian. Divergent revisionist viewpoints are tolerated only insofar as the cult can utilize them tactically. They will be discarded once the cult has achieved power.

Much of the cult resides safely within the Alt-Right just waiting for the opportune moment to spring. Are you informed enough to challenge this dangerous Hive Mind whenever and wherever it appears? If not, you need to read this book. You’ve got nothing to lose and everything to gain.

They are after your mind. Don’t let them have it.

NOW ON AUDIO BOOK: https://amazon.com/dp/B077ZFSYHD/

Get it on Amazon today (softcover): http://amazon.com/Hitler-Worship-Cult-Justification-Publications/dp/1533074763/

Hardcovers are available exclusively upon request. They are $75.00 ea. plus $6.75 shipping. A non-refundable deposit of $50.00 is required prior to any hardcover order. Thank you!

Managing Our Perception of the Third Reich – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B076ZWFH49/

Or, get it on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/Managing-Our-Perception-of-the-Third-Reich-Audiobook/B076ZR7KGC/

University professors, white nationalists, Liberals, MGTOW, Brits, Anglo-Americans and Zionists alike all have a stake in managing the world’s perception of Nazi Germany and World War II.


What are they trying to hide and why do they go to such extremes, including serial harassment and cyberbullying, to control and micromanage the narrative for the rest of us?

This concentrated analysis of the World War II and postwar narrative by author Weronika Kuzniar answers these questions and many more in a relaxed, reader-friendly style.

On Amazon (2nd ed. softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/1545442347/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Managing Our Perception of the Third Reich – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B076ZWFH49/

Or, get it on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/Managing-Our-Perception-of-the-Third-Reich-Audiobook/B076ZR7KGC/

On Amazon (2nd ed. softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/1545442347/

On Amazon (1st ed. softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/148393554X/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Hitler’s Black Soldiers: Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Non-German Descent in Hitler’s Army & Reich

Hitler’s Black Soldiers: Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Non-German Descent in Hitler’s Army & Reich by Weronika Kuzniar

Military Historian Weronika Kuzniar Clark has “dared” to challenge the absurdly one-sided version of the Third Reich. This book, unlike so many, challenges the usual Third Reich history. Primary evidence, foreign language material, Hitler speeches, and dozens of photos that have either been omitted or obfuscated have finally been brought forth in this amazing, unbiased analysis of Hitler’s army & empire.

On Amazon (softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/197581844X/

At our Wilk Mocy eStorehttps://www.createspace.com/7452229

Why would any Black person volunteer to fight for the Nazis? And how could such a thing even happen?

We have all been systematically indoctrinated to believe, without question or critical thought, that the Nazis were the “most lethally racist regime in all of history.” But is this true?

No. It is not.

In a span of just 6 years, the “most lethally racist regime in all of history” created the most ethnically, politically, culturally, religiously, racially, and militarily diverse fighting force in Western history. This book explains how and why this happened. It explains how National Socialism’s racism gave way under political and military pressure. Expand your intellectual horizons and dare to challenge your preconceived notions about Nazi racism.

You will not be disappointed!




black nazis clark-2

black nazis clark-1





You will come away from this war and society study with a deeper understanding of:

• racial dynamics in all Western societies before and since World War II;
• Axis history in general;
• Allied war criminality;
• non-German Wehrmacht and SS service;
• Adolf Hitler’s ambivalent racial views;
• racial changes that occurred despite the official Nazi race ethos as a result of the war;
• the tolerant, arbitrary or inconsistent treatment of Jews, black people, Roma, non-Germans and mixed-race people in Nazi Germany and in the Greater Reich.

**Hardcovers available upon request**

Black Nazis II (2010 ed.) at the USHMM library:


“Hitler’s” Table Talk? – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B076FDPHFN/

Or, get it on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/Hitlers-Table-Talk-A-Study-in-Academic-Fraud-Scandal-Audiobook/B076FHVZF7

On Amazon (1st ed. softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/1548258768

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!


WORLD FREEMASONRY UNVEILED audio book now available: https://amazon.com/dp/B072LVMKJZ/

What is Freemasonry and what are its goals?

Most of us have been taught that Freemasonry is just a philanthropic organization dedicated to helping advance the interests of mankind in a positive direction. But if this is true, then why is Freemasonry a secret society? Why do the brethren conduct their business behind lock and key? Why do they refer to non-Masons as “profane”? Why do they discriminate against women? And why are Masons so prevalent in government, finance, the military and business?

This rare and original Third Reich publication answers these questions, and so many more, concisely and simply. If you want to know why the world exists as it does, and why politics is the way it is, then you must read this booklet!!

You may also get our fully revised, reformatted & updated Wilk Mocy printing of “WORLD FREEMASONRY UNVEILED” in softcover on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/1546522646/.

Or, get the first edition: https://amazon.com/dp/1482748967/

THE OTHER NAZIS audio book

#BlackNazis and #NaziDiversity are historical reality. The only question is how we deal with that reality.

THE OTHER NAZIS audio book now available: https://amazon.com/dp/B0721THLSM/

According to Serge Bile, Carlos Greykey, a Black man who was interned at Mauthausen by the Nazis, had fought for the Communists in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. This, and not his race, is why he was interned in a German KZ (concentration camp). Needless to say, he survived the war.

To learn more about Mr. Greykey and other Black people under Nazi rule, get our fully revised, reformatted & updated Wilk Mocy printing of “THE OTHER NAZIS” in softcover on Amazon today:

Or, get the first edition: https://amazon.com/dp/1483966518/


THE CONTROVERSY OF BLACK NAZIS II audio book now available: https://amazon.com/dp/B072XV4HJF/

Why is the Black Nazis book series and thesis so controversial to so many? Why have extremists on both the left and right attacked the author’s premise with such indignant ferocity? This concise interview conducted by Ernest Young of Germany’s Zuerst! magazine of author Veronica K. Clark answers these questions in a listener-friendly interview. One of a kind, straight to the point, and loaded with rare factual tidbits, no listener will come away from this book without having learned something new and intriguing about racial relations in the Third Reich and the German military establishment.

You may also get our fully revised, reformatted & updated Wilk Mocy printing of “THE CONTROVERSY OF BLACK NAZIS II” in softcover on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/1483954072/

The Controversy of Black Nazis II – Now on Audio Book!

Get this fascinating title on Audible today: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/The-Controversy-of-Black-Nazis-II-Audiobook/B072XW3KLL

Or, get it on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B072XV4HJF/

On Amazon (1st ed. softcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1483954072/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Audible or Amazon if you enjoyed this audio book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

The Other Nazis – Now on Audio Book!

Get this unique title on Audible today: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/The-Other-Nazis-Audiobook/B071GV9SR2/

Or, get it on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0721THLSM/

On Amazon (2nd ed. softcover): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1546476792/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Audible or Amazon if you enjoyed this audio book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Genoud, Heim & Picker’s “Table Talk”: A Study in Academic Fraud & Scandal

by Weronika Kuzniar (V. K. Clark)

Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source. There, I said it. And I’m not just saying this to evoke a reaction. I’m saying it because I really mean it. The renowned “Hitler expert” Lord Dacre, better known as Hugh Trevor-Roper, knowingly and willingly engaged in a massive cover-up regarding Hitler’s Table Talk (hereafter TT).

Had it not been for the outstanding research at the low cost of just $50 taken up by historian Richard Carrier, we might still be in the dark about this, 64 years after TT’s first appearance in the English language. Sorry to bust this bubble, Hitler and Third Reich enthusiasts, but TT is worthless.


In this article, I establish three things: 1) that Hugh Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in academic fraud for profit and prestige, 2) that TT is a worthless primary source, and 3) that renowned Hitler “experts”, both Revisionist and Mainstream, have failed the public regarding reliable Hitler primary sources.

A fake Hitler quote cited by Irmin Vinson on Greg Johnson’s Counter-Currents website:


Read the FREE abridged PDF online (my original contributions to this research pertain to Mr. David Irving and Werner Koeppen): Table-Talk-Debunked-VK-Clark-2017

Just $15.99 for the updated & expanded softcover on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/1548258768/

Or, get it on audiobook: https://amazon.com/dp/B076FDPHFN/

**6/24 UPDATE** The text comparisons have commenced on my end and the results are stunning!

First, we have here Henry Picker’s December 13, 1941 entry (based on the “original” notes of Heinrich Heim before he [Heim] modified and expanded them[!!; op. cit. Nilsson]):

Henry Picker on December 13, 1941 (mittags):

“Es ist gut, dass ich die Pfaffen nicht hineingelassen habe in die Partei. Am 21. März 1933 – Potsdam – war die Frage: Kirche oder nicht Kirche? Ich hatte den Staat gegen den Fluch der beiden Konfessionen erodbert. Wenn ich damals angefangen hätte, mich der Kirche zu bedienen – wir sind an die Gräber gegangen, während die Männer des Staates in der Kirche waren–, so wurde ich heute das Schicksal des Duce teilen. Für sich ist er ein Freigeist. Aber er hat mit Konzessionen begonnen… Ich wurde im Vatikan einmarschieren und die ganze Gesellschaft herausholen. Ich würde dann sagen: “Verzeihung, ich habe mich geirrt!” – Aber sie wären weg!”

My translation:

“It is good that I did not let priests into the party. On 21 March 1933 – Potsdam – the question was: Church or no church? I had conquered the state despite the curse of the two confessions. If I had begun to serve the church — we went to the graves, while the men of the state were in the church — I would now be sharing the fate of the Duce. He is a free-thinker. But he has initiated [begun with] concessions … I would enter the Vatican and throw the whole lot of them out. I’d say, “Excuse me, I’ve been wrong!” – But they would [already] have been out [gone]!”

Source and original entry (13 December 1941, mittags):

Next, we have Heinrich Heim’s modified and expanded version of his own notes purportedly taken down on December 13, 1941 (mittags), which were (unbeknown to Heim) hijacked by Mr. Picker and published as his own in the book above! (We have Mr. Picker to thank for inadvertently exposing Heim as a fabricator in this respect; op. cit. Carrier)

Heim’s modified entry for the same day of 13 December 1941 (mittags):

And the softcover English translation, which, like Heim, adds much content to the original one paragraph entry:

And then we have the following divergent notes from Werner Koeppen, who John Toland (on p. 682 in https://www.amazon.com/dp/0385420536) wrote had “furtively jotted down notes” on a paper napkin as Hitler spoke. Well, if Koeppen furtively jotted notes, then how come he had so much less content than Heim (above) and such different content than both Picker and Heim?

Some of Koeppen’s 9/18/1941 notes (my translation):

Little of Koeppen’s content matches Heim’s. It should match Heim’s entry more closely as far as theme and subject matter if both men furtively took verbatim notes as Hitler spoke to them. In fact, they ought to be identical. But the very different content suggests a lot of omission and divergence on both men’s parts. Not okay for a steno reporter! The only thing we can say for sure after comparing Koeppen’s September 17th (not posted here, but is in my book) through 18th entries is that a general discussion of the eastern front and Reichskommissariat Ukraine took place. Nothing more. We have no idea what Hitler actually said or did not say. The entries agree only in the most general sense. (E.g., Heim features Hitler calling the Slavs “a mass of born slaves” and Koeppen does not.)

Here is Heim’s entry for that day (September 17th to the 18th):

Lastly, the entry of January 18, 1942 (nachts) suffices as the final blow to Heim’s credibility as a reliable steno reporter. Compare Mr. Picker’s hijacked Heim notes with those later expanded and amended by Heim (unbeknown to Picker).

Picker’s hijacked Heim entry (18. Januar 1942, nachts):

Heim’s entry for the exact same time/day (18./19. Januar 1942, nachts):

All updates and textual comparisons have been added to my book.