Tag Archives: Israel

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 13

Copyright©2017. Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

In our thirteenth podcast, the crow flies so deep in this one, well, John and I can’t even really put it into words. Just have a listen and be prepared to have your @zz blown off by our intense discussion of Mazism and how it permeates everything from AI to “innocent” Hollywood films, like Harry Potter.

The liberal press is now exploiting and dominating the growing Alt-Right gender divide “LIKE A BOSS”…

“Alt-right” women are upset that “alt-right” men are treating them terribly: https://www.salon.com/2017/12/04/alt-right-women-are-upset-that-alt-right-men-are-treating-them-terribly/

“Alt-right” women discover that bitter racists are also sexist jerks: https://www.avclub.com/alt-right-women-discover-that-bitter-racists-are-also-1821030509

The Making of an American Nazi: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/12/the-making-of-an-american-nazi/544119/

Japan’s robots stepping up to fill worst labor shortage in 40 years: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/12/07/business/japans-robots-stepping-fill-worst-labor-shortage-40-years/#.WiqZ9Ddrw2x

Increasing numbers of Japan’s youth are asexual: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2012/03/23/increasing-numbers-of-japans-youth-are-asexual/

Japan’s suicide rate exceeds world average: WHO report: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/09/04/national/japans-suicide-rate-exceeds-world-average-who-report/#.Wiinbjdrw2w

Is this the future of schools? ROBOT lets teachers take lessons, check work and talk to students from thousands of miles away: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2992095/Is-future-school-ROBOT-lets-teachers-lessons-check-work-talk-students-thousands-miles-away.html

The Rise Of The Robo-Waiter: https://www.npr.org/2011/05/13/136282554/the-rise-of-the-robo-waiter

Robots Will Transform Fast Food: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/01/iron-chefs/546581/

The Herbivore’s Dilemma: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2009/06/the_herbivores_dilemma.html

Robots could force 800 million people out of a job, finds study: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/robots-job-losses-replace-workers-humans-mckinsey-employment-skills-a8082661.html

Lucifer: Satan, or Venus?: http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/astrologicalmusings/2009/07/lucifer-satan-or-venus.html

Liber AL vel Legis by Aleister Crowley: http://lib.oto-usa.org/libri/liber0220.html

World Freemasonry Unveiled: Ordo ab Chao (softcover ed.): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1546522646/

World Freemasonry Unveiled (audiobook ed.): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B072LVMKJZ/

#076 Freemasonry: Ideology, Organization and Policy: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0057WJPFC/

Hitler’s race views by 1944.
Black Pigeon Speaks
Black Pigeon Speaks
My mixed race DNA. No, I am not 100% “pure white”.
Kuzy’s DNA
Kuzy’s DNA
Kuzy’s DNA
Helmuth von Pannwitz
Otto Kulessa – part Aborigine KZ Bergen-Belsen guard
Ernst Hanfstaengl
This is “100% pure German”?
Reinhard Heydrich compared to a pure Armenoid type.
Reinhard Heydrich compared to a pure Armenoid type.
These eyes are not white, folks.
Goebbels was 100% pure German?
Reinhard Heydrich’s bust is evidence of Armenoid race features.
Adolf Eichmann’s “hooked nose” cannot be denied under any circumstances. He was not Jewish, but he sure as heck wasn’t “pure white” either.
Non-white eyes of Reinhard Heydrich
Mulatto Editha Horn
Mulatto Mandenga Ngando
Mulatto Ewan Ngando
Nazi cucks? Oh my!
Jewish-German Klaus von Schmeling-Diringshofen
A mixed race family in Nazi Germany? Oh dear!
Jewish General Helmuth Wilberg. He helped blow Poland’s @zz off for Hitler.
Jewish Admiral Bernhard Rogge
Edgar Jacoby was half-Jewish. Whoopsy daisy!
General Erich von Manstein was Jewish. His real surname was Lewinski-Levi.

Adolf Galland

An ideal German woman, according to NS propaganda. Not at all what white nationalist men lust after.

Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus: Flavian Signature Edition: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1461096405

You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 13 – 12/07/2017

Music by Heimatærde & E Nomine.

9 – Official Trailer

Talespin – From Here to Machinery

Key Notes on Adolf Hitler’s Zionist Collaboration

Did Adolf Hitler “cuck out to”/”cuck for” Zion?

While this proposition is open to debate, depending on one’s definition of “political cuckoldry,” we’ll let the actual facts speak in our behalf. And, fact is, regardless of his personal impetus/motives/reasons for doing so, Adolf Hitler was a willing Founding Father of the Jewish State of Israel.

The Hitler Worship Cult: Distortion, Justification & Mythmaking (Powerwolf Publications) (Volume 13): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1533074763/

Hitler, whether the Alt-Reich/Alt-Right likes it or not, was a Founding Father of the Jewish ethnostate of Israel, which Alt-Right hero-President Donald J. Trump just officially endorsed via his declaration of Jerusalem as the CAPITAL of the Jewish State. The silence of the Hitler Worship Cult (HWC)/Alt-Right community is deafening.

Zionist Jews collaborated with Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP/Foreign Office in forcefully relocating Jews, by hook or by crook, from Europe to Palestine (now Israel). Here’s a synopsis of Klaus Polkehn’s main points in his groundbreaking article, The Secret Contacts – Zionism and Nazi Germany 1933-1941:

The discriminatory [Nazi] round-up of German Jews and their persecution was planned and implemented with the consent and collaboration of Jews who proudly called themselves “Zionist.”
A year and a half after the outbreak of war, January 11, 1941 , the Irgun Zvai Leumi offered an agreement of collaboration with the Third Reich. They said:
“It is often stated in the speeches and utterances of the leaders of Nationalist Socialist Germany that a New Order in Europe requires as a prerequisite the radical solution of the Jewish question through evacuation. (Judesreines Europa)
The solving of the Jewish Problem [Irgun Leumi’s words] and thus the liberation of the Jewish people once and for all [i.e., the “Final Solution”] is the objective of the political activity and the years’ long struggle of the Jewish freedom movement: the National Military Organization [NMO] (Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Palestine.
The NMO, which is well acquainted with the goodwill of the German Reich Government [the Nazi Government] and its authorities towards Zionist activity inside Germany and towards Zionist emigration plans is of the opinion that:
1 . Common interests could exist between the establishment of a new order in Europe in conformity with the German [Nazi] concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as they are embodied by the NMO.
2. Cooperation between the new [Nazi] Germany and a renewed Hebrew nation would be possible.
3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis and bound by a treaty with the [Nazi] German Reich would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.”

Source: https://archive.org/details/TheSecretContacts-ZionismAndNaziGermany1933-1941

Ethiopian women in Jewish state ‘given contraceptive without consent’

Food for thought heading into 2018…

by Phoebe Greenwood | February 28, 2013

Israel’s health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian immigrants have unwittingly had Depo-Provera jabs for years

Israel’s health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent.

Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis.

Yaakov Litzman, Israel’s deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday.

The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.

It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.

Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers.

Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera.

Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel.

“No, we didn’t want to take it, we refused. We said we didn’t want it,” the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused.

“This happened to many, many other women,” Reuben said.

More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV.

Israel’s health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community.

“The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view,” a spokesperson said.

And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera.

“Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It’s supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich,” Reuben said.

“It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry.”

Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem’s Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections.

“This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia’s interests to treat women preparing to leave the country,” Aboodia said.

“Something is definitely wrong here. I’m very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job.”

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/28/ethiopian-women-given-contraceptives-israel

Netanyahu: It is time to deport African migrants

Food for thought heading into 2018…

by Yonah Jeremy Bob | November 19, 2017

Netanyahu was discussing an initiative announced last week by Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan and Interior Minister Arye Deri to close Holot, an “open” detention center.

It is time to increase the pace of deporting African migrants, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the cabinet on Sunday.

Netanyahu said he has a three-pronged policy regarding getting migrants to leave the country, with the current focus being to encourage most of them to self-deport to a third country – which reports have identified as Rwanda.

In the years prior to 2012, a flood of African migrants crossed into Israel illegally, at one point reaching around 64,000 annually.

Netanyahu said that the state had already carried out the first two prongs of its strategy: stopping the flow of new migrants by building a wall and through legislation, as well as getting more than 20,000 migrants to leave.

The third stage of deporting migrants at an increased pace, he said, “can be carried out thanks to an international agreement which I obtained which allows us to deport the 40,000 remaining infiltrators against their will.”

“This is very important. This will allow us to empty the Holot Detention Center in the future and to redirect portions of the large resources we are using there,” from guarding the migrants, to other needs of the state.

Netanyahu was discussing an initiative announced last week by Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan and Interior Minister Arye Deri to close Holot, an “open” detention center where a few thousand migrants have been sent to try to convince them to self-deport.

Erdan and Deri’s idea would be to offer migrants the choice of “voluntarily” deporting to a third country or being put in regular prison indefinitely.

Several organizations, including The Hotline for Refugees and Migrants, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Amnesty International Israel, Kav LaOved, Physicians for Human Rights – Israel, Aid Organization for Refugees and Asylum Seekers, and the African Refugee Development Center responded to Netanyahu, Erdan and Deri by slamming the initiative.

They accused the government of violating its international obligations and of using incitement against migrants.

“The Holot detention center, an isolated prison that was meant to make asylum seekers’ lives miserable, should have been forbidden in the first place. From the words of Minister Erdan it is clear that the government was lying to the High Court when they denied that the purpose of Holot was to make asylum seekers leave Israel,” they said.

“Holot needs to be shut down immediately,” they continued, “and instead of a policy of oppression, lies to the High Court, detention and deportation, the government should fulfill the moral and legal obligations of Israel to protect asylum seekers and ensure their right to live in dignity.”

Until now, Israel was only allowed to deport migrants to third countries if they agreed to self-deportation and were not viewed as being coerced.

However, in August, the High Court of Justice both struck down a tougher state policy against migrants and implied that if the state managed to get a third country to accept migrants and passed a new law to exploit such a deal, then deportation of migrants against their will could become legal.

The High Court distinguished between deporting migrants to a third country, such as Rwanda, and to the migrants’ country of origin.

Israel is a signatory to the Convention on Refugees which prevents it and other signatories from deporting illegal migrants back to their countries of origin if they would face persecution.

There is an ongoing debate about whether Eritreans, Israel’s largest group of migrants, fled Eritrea due to persecution or to improve their economic status.

Deporting to a third country sidesteps this legal debate.

It is unclear, however, if the High Court would endorse indefinite detention in a regular prison as an alternative to self-deportation.

The High Court has said that one of the reasons that it declared the old state policy unconstitutional was because the state was trying to coerce migrants to self-deport at the same time as having signed a deal with the third country that migrants would only be sent voluntarily. However, it did not explain how far the state could go to “convince” migrants to be deported.

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency expressed concern over the proposal.

“Due to the secrecy surrounding this policy and the lack of transparency concerning its implementation, it has been very difficult for UNHCR to follow up and systematically monitor the situation of people relocated to these African countries. UNHCR, however, is concerned that these persons have not found adequate safety or a durable solution to their plight and that many have subsequently attempted dangerous onward movements within Africa or to Europe,” the agency said in a statement.

“As party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, Israel has legal obligations to protect refugees and other persons in need of international protection,” said UNHCR’s Assistant High Commissioner for Protection, Volker Türk. “UNHCR and the international community have been assisting Israel to meet its international obligations, including by resettling or finding other durable solutions for 2,400 refugees who have departed from Israel in the last couple of years.” 

Meanwhile, also on Sunday, the High Court ruled that the state’s policy restricting migrants from bringing most packaged food products into the Holot detention center was unconstitutional.

The High Court did however endorse the state’s policy of preventing migrants from cooking within the facility.

Regarding packaged products, the court wrote that the state had said it had restricted packaged foods because it believed that a packaged can of tuna had caused an outbreak of some kind of illness.

The court asked rhetorically, “Because of one bad can of tuna, does the whole prison need to be penalized?” It suggested that the state could make some targeted restrictions that had a rational basis, but had to start from the standpoint that most items should be permitted since the migrants in Holot are not categorized as criminals.

However, the decision does not go into effect for 90 days, which, taken with the new initiative to close the facility, leaves it unclear as to whether it will ever be implemented.

Source: http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Netanyahu-Time-to-increase-deportation-of-African-migrants-514604

‘Crystal Night’ Redux: This Time it’s 2017 in Israel

Hundreds of Jewish Teens Run Riot in Muslim Part of Jerusalem’s Old City

Related Powerwolf Publication: https://amazon.com/dp/1540692175/

One Palestinian shop owner was attacked as some 400 youths were reported to have marched through the Muslim Quarter shouting, banging doors and throwing rocks on the eve of Jewish festival

by Nir Hasson | October 13, 2017

A Palestinian shop owner was hospitalized after hundreds of Jewish teenagers reportedly rioted in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City on Wednesday night.

Rioters wreak havoc in the Old City’s Muslim Quarter, Oct 11, 2017.

According to Palestinian eyewitnesses, approximately 400 youths marched through the Old City from the Western Wall towards the Muslim Quarter’s Damascus Gate, allegedly shouting, beating the doors of houses and shops, throwing rocks and smashing car windows.

As they approached Damascus Gate, the youths stormed an open shop and attacked the shop’s Palestinian owner. The owner was taken to Hadassah University Hospital to be treated for his wounds and was released in the morning, his injuries described as “light.”

A police force of about 20 officers later arrived at the scene and escorted the rioters out of the Old City however no arrests were made. Police issued a statement on Thursday morning saying that there had been a fight between two groups of youths.

“During the night, a confrontation broke out between young people on Hagai Street in the Old City, during which stones were thrown,” the police said.

Police confirmed that an investigation had been opened into the incident and that damage had been caused to a shop, and a number of motor vehicles.

Damage caused by the rioters, Oct 11, 2017.

Louis Zorba, a resident of the Muslim Quarter, said: “I heard shouts and banging on the houses, but we are used to it because it happens every time there is a Jewish holiday.”

“There were more than 400 people there,” he said, “and only 20 police officers.”

“I told the officers that if it were Palestinians who were rioting, they would have sent for reinforcements, and probably shot tear gas and stun grenades.”

NGO Ir Amim said: “This is not the first time that the police have not done their job to protect the Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem.”

The NGO claimed the police had attempted to hide the nature of the incident when it described the incident in its statement as a fight between groups of youths, and not as an attack on Palestinians and their property.

Source: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.816890

Netanyahu’s revisionism consistent with Zionism’s collaboration with Hitler

Food for thought…

by Daniel Margrain | October 25, 2015

Angela Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert last week confirmed what everybody except neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers and neoZionists like Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu have long understood when he said that the “responsibility for the Holocaust lay with the Germans.” Netanyahu’s offensive and slanderous contrarian view made during an address to the 37th Zionist Congress, came after a day of violence that saw five Palestinians, including alleged attackers, killed in the occupied territories and an Israeli killed in a traffic incident in the West Bank.

In his speech, Netanyahu focused on incitement, saying Palestinian incitement could be traced back to before the creation of the Israeli state, and claimed that a Palestinian religious leader had encouraged Adolf Hitler to carry out the Holocaust. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, “flew to Berlin,” Netanyahu said. “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.” “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here.’ ‘So what should I do with them?’ he asked. He said, ‘Burn them.”

However, contrary to Netanyahu’s account, there is not a single reference in the entire text of the official record of the conversation between Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin al-Husseini to “Jew burning”. The fact that most Holocaust scholars insist the first death camps were formed before the 1941 meeting between Husseini and Hitler would seem to suggest that Hitler’s plan was already in place by the time they met.

But just as significant, Netanyahu’s lies underscore the secret history that ideologically links Zionism to Hitler fascism. This includes outright collaborations with the Nazis predicated on the notion that the formation of a Zionist state would be part of the system of colonial domination of the rest of the world.

In setting out the Zionist programme, the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl in a 1896 pamphlet called The State of the Jews, called for a Jewish state to be set up in an under developed country outside Europe with the backing of one of the major imperialist powers in order to support the former’s colonizing of it. To achieve this aim the Zionists aligned themselves with notorious anti-Semites that included Count Von Plehve, the sponsor of the worst anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia.

In 1933, The Zionist Federation of Germany sent a memorandum of support to the Nazis and later that year the World Zionist Organization congress defeated a resolution for action against Hitler by a vote of 240 to 43. The author Ralph Schoenman notes in the Hidden History of Zionism:

“Throughout the late thirties and forties, Jewish spokespersons in Europe cried out for help, for public campaigns, for organized resistance, for demonstrations to force the hand of the allied governments – only to be met not merely by Zionist silence but by active Zionist sabotage of the meager efforts which were proposed or prepared in Great Britain and the United States.”

The dirty secret of Zionist history is that Zionism was threatened by the Jews themselves. Defending the Jewish people from persecution meant organizing resistance to the regimes that menaced them. But these regimes embodied the imperial order which comprised the only social force willing or able to impose a settler colony on the Palestinian people. Hence, the Zionists needed the persecution of the Jews to persuade Jews to become colonizers afar, and they needed the persecutors to sponsor the enterprise.

Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first leader, wasn’t satisfied with the arrangement that followed the 1947 partition of the country into separate Jewish and Palestinian states by the leading imperial powers. This was despite the fact that the Jews comprised just 31 per cent of the population but had been given 54 per cent of the fertile land. The end goal for Ben-Gurion and the Zionists was the aspiration towards the establishment of Eretz Yisrael (Greater Israel) – a fascistic concept no different in principle to the aims of the Nazis.

The Zionist project could only be completed if the Palestinians were expelled from their historical homeland. In 1948 this policy was put into effect. Just as Ben-Gurion needed the persecution of the Jews in order to justify his colonization of a foreign land, Netanyahu needs to persuade modern day Israeli Jews of the racist revisionist myth that rejects Hitler’s main responsibility for the Holocaust.

Neo-nazi Andrew Anglin on Israeli television (2017).

Netanyahu’s outrageous speech effectively lets Hitler off the hook with the aim of putting the blame for the suffering of the Jews and Hitler’s Final Solution on the shoulders of the Palestinian people so as to self-justify his continued obliteration of them.

When in 2005 Iran’s former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, allegedly denied the Holocaust, there was legitimate uproar and worldwide condemnation and media saturation coverage of his comments. This is in sharp contrast to the lack of mainstream media coverage following Netanyahu’s remarks that were no less offensive and outrageous.

Given that Netanyahu underplayed the role Hitler played in the Holocaust, neither he, nor his fellow Jewish extremist fundamentalists, have any wriggle room with which to critique, with any credibility, Holocaust deniers ever again.

Source: https://bsnews.info/netanyahus-holocaust-revisionism-is-consistent-with-zionisms-collaboration-with-hitler/

Soros and Reptilians Controlling the World: Yair Netanyahu Posts Meme Rife With anti-Semitic Themes

Just some food for thought…

Haaretz | September 9, 2017

Ex-KKK leader David Duke comes to the defense of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s son after he posts a meme that suggests a conspiracy is behind his family’s growing legal problems

Yair Netanyahu, the son of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, posted an image on his Facebook page Saturday that seems to suggest a conspiracy is behind his family’s growing legal problems. The meme is laden with anti-Semitic imagery.

The meme, captioned “the food chain,” features a photo of George Soros dangling the world in front of a reptilian creature, who dangles an alchemy symbol in front of a caricature of a figure reminiscent of the anti-Semitic “happy merchant” image.

The other figures in the chain are former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, anti-Netanyahu protest leader Eldad Yaniv and Meni Naftali, a former chief caretaker at the Netanyahus’ official residence who implicated Sara Netanyahu in the case she is being indicted in.

Soros, a Hungarian-born Jewish American billionaire, has spent a large part of his fortune funding pro-democracy and human rights groups. Among the organizations he funds is Human Rights Watch, a frequent critic of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and its policies toward the Palestinians. The images of Soros and the reptile evoke anti-Semitic conspiracy theories claiming that Jews control the world.

The neo-Nazi Daily Stormer also posted an article regarding the meme entitled “Netanyahu’s Son Posts Awesome Meme Blaming the Jews for Bringing Down his Jew Father,” in which they called Yair Netanyahu “a total bro.”

This version of the meme seems to have originated on a right-wing Facebook page. The meme is nearly identical to, and appears to be adapted from, a viciously anti-Semitic image that has been repeatedly posted across the internet in recent years on racist and conspiracy-theory message boards.

Like most memes, it is impossible to determine who originally created it. In one instance, it was posted by a white supremacist named John de Nugent with the title “Illuminatus Jew Dumb American Burger” in its URL.

In the original version of the meme, the first figure in the “food chain” is an obese walrus in an American flag T-shirt tempted by a hamburger dangled in front of him. Behind the man is an Orthodox Jew motivated by money, controlled by the same Illuminati figure featured in the cartoon that Netanyahu posted, with the same giant lizard looming over them all.

The Southern Poverty Law Center describes de Nugent as “a prolific writer who has worked with numerous hate groups including the neo-Nazi National Alliance and the Holocaust-denying Barnes Review. De Nugent has run for elected office, and has even vowed to one day become president. While maintaining racist views about numerous racial and ethnic groups, de Nugent is particularly anti-Semitic, believing that the Jews are, along with nefarious space aliens, intent on exterminating the Aryan race.”

After Haaretz published a report about his meme, Yair Netanyahu dismissed the claim that he is anti-Semitic and accused the newspaper of being exactly that.

Barak, who is depicted in the meme chasing money, suggested that Yair Netanyahu should see a psychiatrist. “Is this what the kid hears at home?” he said. “Is it genetics, or a spontaneous mental illness? It doesn’t matter. In any case, we should fund his psychiatrist instead of security guards and a driver.”

Labor leader Avi Gabbay, also on Twitter, said: “It’s a particularly sad day for Israel when a caricature that’s endorsed by the head of the KKK emerges from the home of the prime minister of the Jewish state.”

MK Zehava Galon (Meretz) added that “motifs in the Netanyahu family are anti-Semitic par excellence.” MK Merav Ben Ari (Kulanu) said that “this post deserves all manners of condemnation, from the left and the right. I’m on the right.”

Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit announced Friday that Sara Netanyahu would be indicted for fraud and breach of trust. She is to be charged with spending 359,000 shekels ($102,000) in state funds on catering at the prime minister’s official residence, while falsely claiming that the house did not employ a cook. The indictment is subject to a hearing, whose date has not yet been announced.

Prime Minister Netanyahu has accused Naftali, the last link in Yair Netanyahu’s meme, of inflating spending on food during his tenure as chief caretaker of the official residence.

Source: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.811374

Israel Admits: We’re Incapable of Forcing Out All 40,000 Asylum Seekers

A little food for thought…

Ilan Lior | September 6, 2017

Interior Minister Arye Dery acknowledged Monday that Israel cannot force the departure of all asylum seekers from Africa, who number upwards of 40,000.

“Even if problems with third countries are resolved we won’t be able to remove all the infiltrators. There is a certain amount with whom I’ll know how to contend and divide up. Right now it’s too large a mass for us,” said Dery on Monday in an interview with on Army Radio.

Dery reiterated that Israel was trying to amend the agreements reached with third countries so that the consent of deportees is no longer required before they are sent to those countries. In the meantime, the Population and Immigration Authority is promoting an amendment to the law regulating entry into Israel, which would allow the indefinite detention of asylum seekers who refuse to go to Rwanda or Uganda. The Supreme Court has restricted the incarceration of people refusing to leave to two months.

Dery criticized the Supreme Court’s decision. “We hid nothing from the Court. The Court sent us back and forth several times and received the outline of our agreement with third countries, who expressly knew that we were not taking people to airplanes in handcuffs and that people refusing to go would remain under guardianship here until they consented to leave. These countries and the Court knew this, so I’m surprised that they ignored this point,” he said.

In response to a question of whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was surprised by what he saw on a visit to south Tel Aviv, Dery replied in the affirmative several times. The two toured the area in a car with dark-tinted windows, guided by people from the Population and Immigration Authority. This was Netanyahu’s second visit there within a span of several days. In his first eight years in office he had not been there once.

Dery: In south Tel Aviv, “you hardly see any Israeli out at night”

“When you see the atmosphere there, on a pleasant day with everyone outdoors, it’s nice to see,” said Dery. “But when you look at the buildings and streets and you know what Neve Sha’anan, Levinsky and HaGdud HaIvri Streets and the park used to look like, everything has been wiped out. You hardly see any Israeli in the dark hours and it wasn’t even that late. You see those families and their children. When you hear police reports on what goes on there at night and you realize that Tel Aviv residents still live there, Israelis and Jews who found a place for themselves there. Why are they to blame?”

Dery voiced some veiled criticism at his Shas rival Eli Yishai, who was interior minister between 2009 and 2013, when most African asylum seekers entered Israel. “I really don’t know who put them on buses after they crossed the fence on the border with Egypt, bringing them to Tel Aviv. Who decided to bring them there, of all places? Who decided to place them among the weakest population and destroy its way of life and its neighborhoods? The issue of who made this cruel and foolish decision should be looked into. I opposed it when I saw it,” he said.

The new director-general of the Population and Immigration Authority, Prof. Shlomo Mor-Yosef, who assumed his post last month, said in an interview to Reshet Bet radio that it might be possible to deal with the asylum seekers in Israel, but if conditions are eased many others might come. “On a personal level and as an option that’s on the table, of course it’s an option. Ultimately one could say that there is a certain number here and further entry has been blocked, so let’s deal with these 40,000 people. This is a limited problem which could have a solution. But what if 20,000 others arrive?” he asked. “What happens when they see that the state can live with that, saying OK, keep on coming? That’s why such a decision is not on the agenda now. No one is raising this as a possibility. Now we want to minimize the numbers of illegal infiltrators in Israel.”

Mor-Yosef related to criticism of Dery’s announcement that he would forbid the employment of asylum seekers who refuse to leave for a third country. “We aren’t starving them. It’s not at that level. Illegal migrants cannot work, according to the entire world. At one point there was no option so we let them work in order to survive. Now there is an option which Israel prefers. No one is starving them. They are given $3,500, a plane ticket and accompaniment to a third country so that they can live there peacefully. The state wants them to exercise that option and if they don’t, it doesn’t want to provide them with any more benefits.”

Source: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.810601

A Replacement of Population Is Taking Place In Europe

by Giulio Meotti | June 14, 2017

  • People-smugglers bring the migrants to the NGOs’ ships, which then reach Italian seaports. Another legal enquiry has been opened about the mafia’s economic interests in managing the migrants after their arrival.
  • One cannot compare the migrants to the Jews fleeing Nazism. Pope Francis, for example, recently compared the migrants’ centers to Nazi “concentration camps”. Where are the gas chambers, medical “experiments,” crematoria, slave labor, forced marches and firing squads? These comparisons are spread by the media for a precise reason: shutting down the debate.
  • By 2065, it is expected that 14.4 million migrants will arrive. Added to the more than five million immigrants currently in Italy, 37% of the population is expected to be foreigners: more than one out of every three inhabitants.

First, it was the Hungarian route. Then it was the Balkan route. Now Italy is the epicenter of this demographic earthquake, and it has become Europe’s soft underbelly as hundreds of thousands of migrants arrive.

With nearly 10,000 arrivals in one recent three-day period, the number of migrants in 2017 exceeded 60,000 — 48% more than the same period last year, when they were 40,000. Over Easter weekend a record 8,000 migrants were rescued in the Mediterranean and brought to Italy. And that is just the tip of the iceberg: during the summer, the number of arrivals from Libya will only increase.

A replacement of population is under way in Italy. But if you open the mainstream newspapers, you barely find these figures. No television station has dedicated any time to what is happening. No criticism is allowed. The invasion is considered a done deal.

In 2016, 176,554 migrants landed in Italy — an eight-fold increase since 2014. In 2015, there were 103,792. In 2014, there were 66,066. In 2013, there were just 22,118. In the last four years, 427,000 migrants reached Italy. In only the first five months of this year, 2017, Italy received 10% of the total number of migrants of the last four years.

There are days when the Italian navy and coast guard rescue 1,700 migrants in 24 hours. The country is exhausted. There are Italian villages where one-tenth of the population is already made up of new migrants. We are talking about small towns of 220 residents and 40 migrants.

One of the major aspects of this demographic revolution is that it is taking place in a country which is dramatically aging. According with a new report from the Italian Office of Statistics, Italy’s population will fall to 53.7 million in half a century — a loss of seven million people. Italy, which has one of the world’s lowest fertility rates, will lose between 600,000 to 800,000 citizens every year. Immigrants will number more than 14 million, about one-fourth of the total population. But in the most pessimistic scenario, the Italian population could drop to 46 million, a loss of 14 million people.

In 2050, a third of Italy’s population will be made up of foreigners, according to a UN report, “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Decline and Aging Populations”, which designs a cultural melting-pot that could explode in cultural and social tensions. The level of arrivals will fall from 300,000 to 270,000 individuals per year by 2065; during the same period, it is expected that 14.4 million people will arrive. Added to the more than five million immigrants currently in Italy, 37% of the population is expected to be foreigners: more than one out of every three inhabitants.

In addition, the humanitarian-aid system has been hit by new scandals. “The investigative hypothesis to be verified is that subjects linked to ISIS act as logistical support to migration flows”, was a warning just delivered in front of the Schengen Committee, to the Italian anti-mafia and counterterrorism prosecutor, Franco Roberti. There are now judges investigating the connection between the migrants’ smugglers in North Africa and the Italian NGOs rescuing them in the Mediterranean. People-smugglers bring the migrants to the NGOs’ ships, which then reach Italian seaports. Another legal enquiry has been opened about the mafia’s economic interests in managing the migrants after their arrival.

Only 2.65 percent of those migrants who arrived in Italy were granted asylum as genuine refugees, according to the United Nations. The other people are apparently not fleeing wars and genocide. Yet, despite all this evidence, one cannot compare the migrants to the Jews fleeing Nazism. Pope Francis, for example, recently compared the migrants’ centers to Nazi “concentration camps”. One wonders where are the gas chambers, medical “experiments,” crematoria, slave labor, forced marches and firing squads. Italian newspapers are now running articles about the “Mediterranean Holocaust”, comparing the migrants dead by trying to reach the southern of Italy to the Jews gassed in Auschwitz. Another journalist, Gad Lerner, to support the migrants, described their condition with the same word coined by the Nazis against the Jews: untermensch, inferior human beings. These comparisons are spread by the media for a precise reason: shutting down the debate.

To understand how shameful these comparisons are, we have to take a look at the cost of every migrant to Italy’s treasury. Immigrants, once registered, receive a monthly income of 900 euros per month (30 euros per day for personal expenses). Another 900 euros go to the Italians who house them. And 600 euros are needed to cover insurance costs. Overall, every immigrant costs to Italy 2,400 euros a month. A policeman earns half of that sum. And a naval volunteer who saves the migrants receives a stipend of 900 euros a month. Were the Nazis so kind with their Jewish untermenschen?

The cost of migrants on Italy’s public finances is already immense and it will destroy the possibility of any economic growth. “The overall impact on the Italian budget for migrant spending is currently quantified at 2.6 billion [euros] for 2015, expected to be 3.3 billion for 2016 and 4.2 for 2017, in a constant scenario”, explains the Ministry of the Economy. If one wants to put this in proportion, these numbers give a clearer idea of how much Italy is spending in this crisis: in 2017, the government is spending 1.9 billion euros for pensions, but 4.2 billion euros for migrants, and 4.5 billion euros for the national housing plan against 4.2 billion euros for migrants.

The Italian cultural establishment is now totally focused on supporting this mass migration. The Italian film nominated at the Academy Awards last year is Fire at Sea, in which the main character is a doctor treating the migrants upon their arrival. Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi carried with him 27 DVDs of the film to a session of the European Council. Italy’s commercial television channels produced many television programs about the migrants, such as “Lampedusa”, from the name of the Italian island. 100,000 Italians even took the streets of Milan for a “rally of solidarity” with the migrants. What “solidarity” can there be if half a million people have been rescued by the Italian government and the whole country seems determined to open its doors to all of North Africa?

Winston Churchill was convinced that the Mediterranean was the “soft underbelly” of Hitler’s Europe. It has now become the soft underbelly of Europe’s transformation into Eurabia.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10525/europe-population-replacement

More Evidence of Nazi Support for Zionism

1934 NAZI PHOTO BOOK ON PALESTINE

PALÄSTINA BERICHT EINES NICHTJUDEN

(PALESTINE REPORT OF A NON-JEW)

A VERY INTERESTING BOOK ON HOW A NATIONAL SOCIALIST SAW THE JEWISH LIFE IN THE COUNTRY WHICH BECAME ISRAEL IN 1948!

This scarce book is a report from a German (obviously a National Socialist) who visited Palestine. In the book which was printed 1934 from the Prager Verlag in Leipzig the author Kurt Stechert gives back what he saw in the land of Jews. The author tries to be as objective as possible but the Nazi ideology shines through in the text. I.e. he compares the Jewish “Kibbutz” with the German Labor Front and guess which organization “wins” in this comparison…

A rare original Third Reich book on Jews for anyone’s collection of historical antisemitic material!

Source

Nazi-Zionist Collaboration Revealed (multiple sources)

Related original Third Reich publication promoting Jewish emigration:

VERY RARE ORIGINAL 1939 GUIDE FOR JEWS

HOW TO LEAVE THE GERMAN THIRD REICH

JÜDISCHE AUSWANDERUNG

(Jewish EMIGRATION)

TO AUSTRALIA AND OTHER COUNTRIES OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE PUBLISHED BY THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IN BERLIN!

This unique 9-1/4 x 12-1/2 inches item with 88 pages is probably one of the last publications which was printed by the Reichsvereinigung der Juden in Deutschland (Reichs association of the Jews in Germany)! It was printed only in a number of 10,000 copies and probably only a handful have survived! It is a detailed guide on how to legally emigrate from Hitler-Germany to a foreign country which is not (yet) ruled by a National Socialist and antisemitic government! This extremely interesting historic item was printed 1939 by the Jüdischer Kulturbund in Deutschland e.V., Abteilung Verlag in Berlin (Jewish cultural association in Germany, publishing division in Berlin). They were located in the Meinekestrasse in the center of Berlin and their building was probably confiscated only shortly after this guide was published.

The book is divided into two main chapters. The first chapter contains general information on the climate in the different regions of the world, the differences in housekeeping, etc. under these new conditions. Chapter two is on the emigration laws, life (especially pointed out the Jewish life!) in Australia, New Zealand, Kenya, Rhodesia, British India and Canada. A smaller chapter also deals about the Jewish emigration to the United States of America. Mentioned are also helpful books which give advice on how to succeed in a foreign country. There are lots of very interesting advertisings, all from Jewish companies, all on the subject of moving, transportation, agents who would help with the immigration process, etc.

According to the Nazi racial laws every male Jew had to add the name Israel and every female the name Sara, this can be seen on the advertisings below.

Source

Foreign news: Zion in Basle

TIME | Monday, July 27, 1931

Amid shouts and tears a chunky, goateed little British industrial chemist, Dr. Chaim Weizmann, was kissed and embraced by his followers last week as the 17th World Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland came to an end. For a fortnight 258 delegates had met in Basle’s stuffy Mustermesse (sample fair) Hall, had emotionally and continually vociferated. Result: a change in presidents; no change in Zionism’s complicated, diffuse political program.

Zionism’s leaders must achieve their ends by diplomacy rather than action. To carry out its program for a Jewish National Home in Palestine, Zionism is attempting to get money from world Jewry (its deficit is now $4,000,000), and concessions from Great Britain, mandate-holder of Palestine. In the Balfour Declaration of 1917, Jewry was promised a permanent Jewish National Home in Palestine. But England, most Zionists agree, has reneged in the last two years. The Simpson Commission issued a report implying that the Zionist land policy in Palestine was harmful to the Arabs. The Passfield White Paper (TIME, Nov. 3), stalling for the moment all Zionist progress, caused Dr. Weizmann to resign as president of the World Zionist Organization. The subsequent, interpretative MacDonald Letter attempted to modify the harshness of the White Paper, but failed to suit most Jews. The problem of dealing with England divided last fortnight’s Congress into two factions, focussed Zion’s attention once more upon its need for strong leadership.

God Save Us! Arab-Jewish riots, Wailing Wall troubles, world Depression, the death of two great leaders (Baron Melchett and Louis Marshall) and the slowing-up of Zionism’s executive machinery made Dr. Weizmann’s presidency a difficult one. But many delegates believe he was too conciliatory. Boomed bass-voiced Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise last fortnight at the Congress: “A vote for the administration of Dr. Weizmann is a vote for the present British regime! . . . An eternal disgrace! . . . You have sat too long at British feasts!” Trembling, still pale from a recent throat operation, Dr. Weizmann hurried from the hall where he had been presiding, cried: “I could not stand it any longer! It is irresponsible and unparliamentary!” Then last week, after long hours of angry debate, a coalition of anti-Weizmannites gathered 118 votes and by electing Dr. Nahum Sokolow president made known their disapproval of the “eternal disgrace.”

But had they insured a new policy? Few thought so: some said they would have voted for the Mustermesse janitor in order to have a new deal. Day after Dr. Sokolow’s election the Congress elected an executive committee in which the majority are Weizmannites. Extremist in talk, the Congress had ended by becoming moderate in action, for the new president, 72-year-old Dr. Sokolow, is conservative, suave, quiet. Eminent among Jewish linguists and scholars, he has all his life been a journalist. Emotionally he spoke at the opening meeting, not in the statesman’s but in the Hebraist’s manner: “We are the oldest martyr people in the world! What pen can describe the wrongs and cruelties we have borne in the course of thousands of years? What good the nations have done us by such action as the Balfour Declaration is not kindness. Shall we now be driven into mistrust of mankind?” Fervently he quoted a Jew from Kishinev who cried: “God save us from commissions and we’ll save ourselves from pogroms!”

Action is the simple program of the Revisionists, who are Dr. Weizmann’s most violent opponents. They demand a national, autonomous Jewish state in Palestine. Zion, say they, may try once more to ”play the game” with England, but let no one think (as does Dr. Weizmann) that the present situation is in the least bearable. Organizer and leader of the Revisionists is 50-year-old Russian-born Vladimir Jabotinsky. Kinetic, rambunctious, romantic, he is called the Hitler, the Mussolini of young Zionists. Round-faced, bespectacled, he is a poet and international journalist. He founded the Jewish Legion of the British Army, fought in Palestine during the World War, was imprisoned in the fortress of Acco for leading a Jewish defense corps against Arab attackers in Jerusalem in 1920. Viewed now as a firebrand, he is forbidden to return to Palestine.

Vladimir Jabotinsky – “The Hitler of Zionism”

Weizmann supporters called the Revisionists ‘”Hitlerites” during the Congress last fortnight. Keeping obligingly in character, they shouted back: “Red slaves! Go to Moscow!” Impressively they arose during a later debate, walked out of the meeting just as dramatically as Hitlerites walked out of the Reichstag last February. Next day they walked back in, minus Leader Jabotinsky who announced he would take a six-month leave. One Revisionist, Abraham Lang, tore down a blue-&-white Zionist flag because he thought the Congress had “betrayed Zionism’s ideals.” He was tried last week, suspended from Zionist activities until next December. Abraham Lang wept.

URL: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,752916,00.html

Epic Hypocrisy: Hitler Worshipers Who Oppose Trump (impossible)

The Hitler Worship Cult (HWC) claims/asserts that Donald Trump is “controlled by Jews.”

Is the HWC aware…

That one of the foundation members of the NSDAP, Emil Maurice, was ethnically part-Jewish?

That one of the early and popular Nazi Party members was Jewish clairvoyant and con man Erik Jan Hanussen?

That Hitler wrote a loophole into the Nuremberg Laws via the Supplementary Decree granting himself sole power to erase someone’s “Jewish stain” with the stroke of a pen?

That Hitler permitted an estimated 150,000 or more ethnically Jewish and part-Jewish persons to serve in the NS military? Clausewitz: “War (applied force) is the continuation of politics (Nazism) by other means (invasion and killing).” Hitler invaded a fellow Nordic-Aryan-Slavic nation, Poland, to erect a German chauvinist empire in Eastern Europe. Hitler used Jewish soldiers and even Jewish money (via the BIS and neutral, pro-Semitic Switzerland) to wage war and mass murder fellow Aryans/whites in Eastern Europe. Ponder that.

That Hitler allied with the “Jewish-Bolsheviks,” his Nemesis, to invade the Aryan/white nation of Poland? Poland was anti-Semitic and, like Nazi Germany, wanted Jewish people to get out of Europe and emigrate to Palestine. Hitler smashed them regardless..with Stalin’s help.

That Hitler sold out Eastern Europe to Josef Stalin and Bolshevism for the sake of carving out a Greater German empire in Eastern Europe? He sold out fellow Aryans for the sake of imperialism and German ‘ego recovery’.

That the Hitler government was granted a huge credit line by the governor of the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, Montagu Norman, in 1933..to get Germany back on her feet and to help  get British made weapons into Hitler’s hands? Look into Vickers like Heinrich Pudor did. (Pudor held the NS government’s feet to the fire.)

That Helmuth Wilberg, a Jewish general, played a pivotal role in crafting Hitler’s “blitzkrieg” strategy as applied against Poland? Wilberg was head of aviation training command in 1939. See Bryan Rigg’s book.

That Hitler befriended and worked closely with at least two Jewish men while he was living as a homeless vagabond in Vienna? He had no problem selling his artwork to Jewish art dealers all over Vienna. These Jewish dealers made his living possible for quite some time. See Brigitte Hamann’s book.

That Hitler’s favorite woman, Winifred Wagner, had many Jewish friends and contacts? She personally acted in behalf of Jews on several occasions (against Hitler). So did Hitler’s friend and photographer, Heinrich Hoffmann.

That Hitler allowed Jewish soldier Ernst Bloch to rescue the Lubavitcher Rebbe Schneerson from the war zone..to make sure he survived unscathed?

That Hitler aided, funded, supported and abetted in every way possible Jewish emigration to Palestine..so that the Zionists could found the Jewish state there?

That Hitler aided, funded and abetted Hantoea, Ltd. to ensure that Jewish emigrants and companies had enough funds to establish themselves in Palestine?

That Hitler trained and housed thousands of Jewish pioneers in his hundreds of Hechaluz camps dotted throughout the Reich to ensure that young Jewish emigrants had the skills to succeed in Palestine?

That Hitler saved Zionism from extinction? Zionism was close to “kaput” in the late 1920s.

We have many, many uploads on this topic in the right sidebar of the website, as well as much more content about this topic in our book The Hitler Worship Cult.

One cannot simultaneously support Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany and oppose Trump unless he or she is a HYPOCRITE. Period.