Copyright©2017. Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.
In our ninth podcast, John and I discuss the “Hitler was always preemptive” thesis–i.e., that Britain initiated all hostilities against Germany and not vice versa–as well as more on the recent Las Vegas shooting/non-shooting. We also look into the suspected murder of Heinrich Himmler and the most likely motive for his murder by the Brits. Have a listen as we send Hitler worshipers and Nazi-bashers alike into a tailspin with pure, unadulterated evidence. You’ll love it!
Israeli Kristallnacht: Africans attacked in Tel Aviv anti-migrant demo (PHOTOS): https://www.rt.com/news/israel-anti-migrant-demo-061/
The confession of Franz Ziereis, commandant of Mauthausen: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/the-confession-of-frank-ziereis-commandant-of-mauthausen/
FRONTLINE: The Confessions: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/the-confessions/
ASEXUAL AGENDA’s interview with Aqua-Ace (Russian): https://asexualagenda.wordpress.com/2014/02/15/a-story-from-the-antisexual-community-an-interview-with-aqua-ace/
Medical Historian Examines NIMH Experiments in Crowding: https://nihrecord.nih.gov/newsletters/2008/07_25_2008/story1.htm
You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!
Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 9 – 10/15/2017
Music by Heimatærde & E Nomine.
More fascinating food for thought…
The role of men, according to Himmler, is to protect and provide for women; to fight and die for the women, children and NS state (which itself exists only to protect women and children). National Socialism is collectivist as well as woman and child centered: procreation/demographics plays a central role in NS politics. (Himmler bashes the priesthood and homosexuality not because he sees it as amoral, but because it leads to declining birthrates for the German ‘race’.)
“150 years ago someone at a Catholic university wrote a doctoral thesis with the title: “Does a woman have a soul?” From this the whole tendency of Christianity emerges: it is directed at the absolute destruction of women and at emphasizing the inferiority of women. The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is, I am firmly convinced, an erotic union of men (Männerbund) for the erection and maintenance of this 2000-year old Bolshevism. I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome. I am of the conviction that the Roman emperors, who eradicated (ausrotteten) the first Christians, did exactly the same thing that we are doing with the communists. These Christians were then the worst yeast which the great city contained, the worst Jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were.
The Bolshevism of that time had now the power to become great on the carcass of the dying Rome. The priesthood of the Christian church which later subjugated the Aryan church in unending conflicts goes on, since the 4th or 5th Century, too long for the celibacy of priests. It relies on Paul and the very first apostles who derogate the woman as something sinful and permit or recommend marriage as merely a legal way out of prostitution – that is in the Bible – and derogate the procreation of children as a necessary evil. This priesthood continues along in this way for several centuries until in 1139 the celibacy of priests is fully implemented.
I am furthermore convinced that the way out for the few who do not want to yield to this homosexuality, especially for the country parsons, the majority of whom – more than 50 % – I estimate not to be gay, is to procure for themselves in confession the necessary married and single women; I assume that in the monasteries the homosexuality ranges from 90 or 95 to100%.
If today the trials that concern homosexuality among priests went on again and if we would treat the priests as [we do] any citizen in Germany, then I would undertake to guarantee for the next three to four years 200 or more such trials. The realization of the trials fails to take place not because there is a lack of cases, but because we just do not have as many officials and judges as we would need to employ. Within the next four years very conclusive evidence will be produced – I hope – that the Church organization in its leadership, its priesthood, is for the most part a homosexual erotic men-union (Männerbund) that on this basis has been terrorizing humanity for the past 1800 years, demands from it the greatest blood sacrifice, and has been sadistically perverse in its utterances in the past. I need only to recall the witch and heretic trials.
The attitude about the inferiority of women is a typical Christian attitude, and we also who have been national socialists up to this day – many even who are strict heathens – have unwittingly adopted this set of ideas. I know even today very many party members who believe they have to prove the special firmness of their worldview (Weltanschauung) and their own special masculinity through very rowdy and truculent behaviour toward women.”
Apparently, Heinrich Himmler was a feminist of sorts. But before we get too excited about the so-called “superior” Germanic (versus Roman Catholic) treatment of women, we read from the same speech by Himmler that:
“The whole theory which one has rightly built up that the Germanic girl, if she is unlucky enough not to get married until 26 or 30-years old, lived up to that time as a nun, is a myth. The blood laws, however, were strict, that no guy and no girl was allowed to mess around with someone of inferior blood. That law was relentlessly and strictly observed. Furthermore this was strict: marital fidelity. If that was broken by the woman, the death penalty was imposed. For from that there was a danger that foreign blood come in.”
The ancient Germans murdered wives who “cheated” on husbands, but not vice versa. Male sexual hypocrisy and double standardism is not limited to Islam, Roman Catholics, Orthodox Jews or non-white men. It’s a male thing, not an “ism” or racial thing. Contrary to WN myth, which would have us women believing that we will have full rights and power as a group and as individuals in an NS society, NS gynocentrism came with a high price for women: total control over their job prospects, earning potential, sexuality and reproduction. German women were viewed solely as “baby makers” for the state and race. Unlike their NS male peers, who were individuals and achievers outside the home and bedroom, NS women could not hope to aspire to much more than a life of housework and motherhood.