Tag Archives: George Soros

Israel ‘fails to meet’ Black asylum seekers’ basic needs in concentration camps

RT | February 29, 2016

Israeli detention centers for African asylum seekers are overcrowded, prison-like facilities where residents suffer from a lack of basic needs including health and translation services, clothing, proper food and legal advice, a report from a human rights group reveals.

The Hotline for Refugees and Migrants, an Israeli organization protecting the rights of refugees, released a report on Monday reviewing conditions in four Israeli migrant detention centers – Holot, Saharonim, Givon and Yahalom.

FILE PHOTO: An African migrant carries his luggage as he leaves Holot detention centre in Israel’s southern Negev desert August 25, 2015. © Amir Cohen / Reuters

The report is based on interviews with 72 people held there, as well as official reports and freedom of information requests. It uncovers major deficiencies in the treatment of migrants, who are mostly asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea.

The respondents complained about a drastic lack of health services, citing language barriers as an additional hindrance barring them from receiving adequate medical assistance. The report notes that in all facilities there is a substantial lack of translation services when detainees interact with the representatives of the prison services, the police, the Ministry of the Interior, doctors and the administrative tribunals.

“Detainees noted that oftentimes doctors are assisted by other prisoners who can translate to Hebrew or English, meaning patients have to share intimate medical details with other detainees,” reads the press release on the group’s official website. In the Saharonim center only three out of 26 migrants reported that a translator was present during a medical examination.

The report also indicates the lack of mental health professionals able to deal with depression, which many asylum seekers suffer from. Either they were not informed about the possibility to receive psychological treatment, or their condition only worsened following an ineffective therapy.

Many detainees complained they were forced into cage-like constructions stationed outside the prisons during administrative tribunal hearings. During waiting periods that could span up to eight hours, people had to endure extreme weather conditions without any food given to them, claims the report.

One problem which seems inherent to all refugee detention facilities is overcrowding. In Saharonim 10 migrants had to squeeze into a room that was designed for 5 people. A similar situation was observed in the Holot detention center, while in Givon about 16 men reportedly had to share one room.

The food lacks diversity and its amount is clearly insufficient, notes the report. Although the conditions in the facilities differ, many complaints were raised about the quality of food, which some migrants describe as inedible or undercooked.

In addition, detainees are not supplied with a sufficient amount of clothing and basic hygiene products such as soap, shampoo and toothpaste, reads the report. Seventy-seven percent of respondents told the interviewers that they had to buy hygienic products.

Human rights workers have limited access to refugees. In some cases, the activists were denied access even after they received prior approval from the centers’ authorities. Adult migrants who are not victims of human trafficking have to pay for legal services, as they are not entitled to free of charge representation.

Israel hosts some 34,000 asylum seekers from Eritrea. The refugees coming to the country are frequently told either to go back or are detained by Israeli authorities. Under Israeli law, illegal African migrants can be incarcerated without bringing any charges for up to three years.

Last year, it was reported that since 2009, Israel has granted temporary residency to five Sudanese citizens, mostly from Darfur, out of more than 3,000 requests.

Israel granted refugee status to just four asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea out of more than 5,000 applicants, Haaretz reports.

Source: https://www.rt.com/news/333996-israel-migrants-human-rights/

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 8

Copyright©2017. Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

In our eighth podcast, John and I discuss the MS King Hitler-worship thesis–i.e., that France initiated hostilities against Germany and not vice versa–as well as the recent Las Vegas shooting/non-shooting. Is the MSM being straight up honest about this event and how it unfolded? Have a listen as we send Krazy Kahant and other Nazi LARPers into a tailspin with pure, unadulterated evidence. You’ll love it!

Relevant 1000-year time lapse video of Europe’s fluid borders (pay particular attention to Poland):


A story from the antisexual community: An interview with Aqua-ace

Relevant links/videos pertaining to “John’s Conspiracy Corner”:

Google kooks worship “AI god”: http://www.iflscience.com/technology/former-google-engineer-is-creating-a-religion-that-worships-an-ai-god/

Sexuals assault AI fembot, crush “her” breasts and ejaculate all over “her”: http://www.iflscience.com/technology/samantha-the-sex-robot-was-groped-by-austrian-men/


You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 8 – 10/07/2017

Music by Heimatærde, Powerwolf & E Nomine.

‘Putin’s Destabilization of America’ Thesis Considered

Something to ponder here, folks…

The Most Dangerous Philosopher in the World

by Paul Ratner | December 18, 2016

The revelations about Russian involvement in the hacking of the Democratic Party officials, intending to vault Trump over Clinton, have added more fuel to an already-explosive and exhausting election cycle. Why would Russia do this, especially as it’s been revealed that Russian President Vladimir Putin was likely personally directing the operation? Enter Alexander Dugin, the political scientist known as “Putin’s Rasputin” or “Putin’s Brain”, as well as an occult fascist. He is also a sociology professor at the highly prestigious Moscow State University, a prolific writer, an advisor to key political and military figures and an articulator of a Kremlin-approved nationalist philosophy.

He has also been on the U.S. sanctions list following Russia’s takeover of Crimea for advocating the murder of Ukrainians, among other things.

It’s not that Dugin is personally responsible for the hacks that are currently being explained as Putin’s personal vendetta against Clinton. But Dugin’s influential philosophy aligns very well with what seems to have happened and provides a stunning window into this and future conflicts with Russia. There are likely much deeper motives behind Russian actions.

Alexander Dugin is at once a sociologist, historian and a philosopher. You can find many of his lectures online on Youtube, although it would help to know Russian. He himself speaks ten languages. Among his many controversial opinions, he has expressed deeply anti-scientific views, calling for the ban of chemistry and physics. He would also get rid of the Internet, an anti-technological view that actually stems from his his desire to ultimately upend the world as we know it.

What he proposes is that there have been three leading political theories that impacted the world in the relatively recent past – liberal capitalism or “liberalism”, communism and fascism. According to Dugin, the United States is the world’s leader of liberalism, which offers individual liberty, a rationalist approach and market competition.

Even though liberalism has been the winning ideology so far, triumphing over fascism in 1945, and communism in 1991 (when the Soviet Union dissolved), Dugin thinks that it is now also experiencing a fatal crisis. He believes liberals themselves would the first to claim that. Dugin regards liberalism nearing a dead end, mired currently in a “nihilistic post-modern stage” because it is trying to liberate itself from rational thought and the oppression of the brain, which to a liberal is “something fascist in itself”. Dugin takes this a step further, describing liberalism as now trying to free the organs of the body from the brain’s control, alluding to its acceptance of the LGBT community.

Here’s how he explains this rationale:

“The liberalism insists on the freedom and liberation from any form of collective identity. That is the very essence of the liberalism. The liberals have liberated the human being from national identity, religious identity and so on. The last kind of collective identity is gender. So there is time to abolish it making it arbitrary and optional.”

What Dugin proposes instead of what he sees as three dead and dying ideologies is his “Fourth Political Theory”. It would create an entirely alternative political model, set against “progress” of world history as is. It would not be based on the issues of individualism, race or nationalism. He sees this theory to be partially based on the work of the existential German philosopher Martin Heidegger, controversial for his association with Nazism. His philosophy calls for a root of a human being’s self-awareness (called dasein by Heidegger) to be saved in the world, as it has been diluted in the modern space by essentially dehumanizing technology.

Since this root of being differs from person to person and from culture to culture, the world should feature a multipolar power division, instead of one superpower in the United States. Finding a way to implement such a new way of looking at the world would, per Dugin, return a sense of identity to humans who have been losing it all around the world.

Dugin contrasts this theory of a multipolar world with what he (and conspiracy theorists worldwide) see as the movement towards creating a “world government,” led by disingenuous “globalist elites” who are out to deprive people of a sense of identity and to subjugate them to their corporate needs.

In this world of a number of regional superpowers, what role would Russia play? Dugin sees Russia to be the leading nation in the Eurasian Union and has founded the International Eurasia Movement to make that happen.

What is Eurasia? Basically, it’s the territory of the former Soviet Union. Dugin thinks the Soviet Union just took over the boundaries of a historical union of people and ethnicities that was there from the Russian Empire. As Russia is a country of a unique culture and destiny, it is its mission to create a center of power that has elements of both Europe and Asia, the two continents straddled by the expansive country.

“The West knows little or nothing at all about the real history of Russia. Sometime they think that the Soviet Union was purely a communist creation and the States as Ukraine, Kazakhstan or Azerbaidjan were independent before the USSR and conquered by Bolsheviks or forced into Soviet State,” says Dugin. “The fact is they never existed as such and represented but administrative districts without any political or historical meaning inside Russian Empire as well as inside USSR. These countries were created in their present borders artificially only after the collapse of USSR and as the result of such collapse.”

So the goal of establishing the Eurasian Union would be essentially to right a historical wrong and bring back a successful empire that existed even before the Soviet Union. Russia’s recent takeover of Crimea and further designs on Ukraine seem to be a logical part of such a plan.

Dugin digs even deeper into his very controversial historical analysis, claiming Eurasia’s current opponent is not just the United States, but Atlanticism, the axis of cooperation between Europe, US and Canada that crosses the Atlantic Ocean. These maritime, liberal nations value individuality and market forces.

Eurasia, on the other hand, represents the conservative philosophy of land-locked continentalism, which according to Eurasians, has among its values a hierarchical structure, law and order, traditionalism and religion.

Thus we have Atlantis vs Eurasia. In fact, Dugin claims all history can be viewed as a battle between maritime and land-based nations.

What does Dugin think about Trump’s victory? He has been quite enthusiastic about Trump throughout the whole election process, to say the least, describing him this way to point out why Trump is a “sensation” that can stand up to globalist elites:

“[Donald Trump] is tough, rough, says what he thinks, rude, emotional and, apparently, candid. The fact that he is a billionaire doesn’t matter. He is different. He is an extremely successful ordinary American…”

Dugin thinks Trump’s victory is a monumental strike against the “globalists”, whose candidate was Hillary Clinton – the same language that you can easily find peppering conservative American websites like Breitbart News, Drudge Report and conspiracy king Alex Jones (a particular favorite of Dugin’s). He thinks Trump’s victory was a kind of “revolution” started by American people and should lead to worldwide defeats of the globalist agenda, draining the proverbial “swamp” the world over.

Dugin doesn’t stop there, however. His visions of what Trump’s victory means go into the apocalyptic and civilization-changing:

“We need to return to the Being, to the Logos, to the foundamental- ontology (of Heidegger), to the Sacred, to the New Middle Ages – and thus to the Empire, religion, and the institutions of traditional society (hierarchy, cult, domination of spirit over matter and so on). All content of Modernity – is Satanism and degeneration. Nothing is worth, everything is to be cleansed off. The Modernity is absolutely wrong — science, values, philosophy, art, society, modes, patterns, “truths”, understanding of Being, time and space. All is dead with Modernity. So it should end. We are going to end it.”

This certainly would not be the first time in recent history a Russian thought that everything is wrong and the world needs to be completely uprooted. We know how that turned out. And the occult-sounding elements of some of what Dugin is saying, along with his beard, perhaps earn the comparison to Rasputin. But does Dugin believe concrete measures should be taken to bring about his vision of the world?

Interestingly, prior to Trump’s victory, influential American conservative outlets like the National Review were warning about Russian intentions, specifically singling out the threat Dugin’s ideology posed, calling Eurasianism “a satanic cult”. Now that Trump won and Russia was implicated in election meddling, they are not so keen to bring that up.

Does Putin really listen to Dugin? Scholars and commentators say his ideas are taken seriously by people in Putin’s circle and their growing popularity matches up with Putin’s evolving authoritarianism and actions. Notably, Dugin came out in 2008 in support of Russian troops taking over Georgia and very much fanned the flames during the 2014 Russia-Ukraine conflict, calling for massacring Ukrainians and annexing the Ukrainian lands that were part of the former Russian Empire.

To see what Dugin might advocate specifically, we can look in his bestselling book “The Foundation of Geopolitics” from 1997, which had particular success among Russian military and according to Foreign Policy (and Dugin’s own words), is assigned as a textbook at Russian military universities.

The book outlines a vision for Russia in the 21st century that would lead to Eurasia’s formation, but also includes specific strategies for defeating or neutralizing the United States. These include destabilization and disinformation campaigns using Russian special forces and asymmetrical warfare, splitting alliances between U.S. and countries like Germany and France, as well as fermenting division within the country itself, specifically singling out race relations. On Page 367 of the first edition of the book, Dugin explains:

“It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics…”

After our hyper-divisive elections, full of calamities described above, facing an increasingly eye-opening investigation into Russian interference in our most cherished democratic institution, it’s hard not to take Dugin’s ideas seriously. With Trump’s victory, Dugin has backed off somewhat from painting the U.S. as enemy number one. It’s also been reported that the relationship between Dugin and Putin might have cooled off recently, with Dugin criticizing Putin for being “too slow” in bringing about his vision of the world. But looking at the facts on the ground it’s possible to conclude that Putin may still be playing a Eurasia-oriented long game that is not going to end only at Wikileaking embarrassing emails. Especially in light of the fact that the United States now finds itself in a vulnerable position, looking for a unifying philosophy and a way forward of its own.

URL: http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/the-dangerous-philosopher-behind-putins-strategy-to-grow-russian-power-at-americas-expense

Additional food for thought…