In our seventh podcast, John and I talk about the Vox Day-Anglin debate on National Socialism–Left, Right, both or neither? We also discuss several sociopolitical topics and current events, from the politicization of Hollywood and the NFL to feudalism and AI. Loaded with unique insight, this episode is not lacking in amusement value. Have a listen as Bibi makes the US Cuckgress dance!
Angela Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert last week confirmed what everybody except neoNazi Holocaust deniers and neoZionists like Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu have long understood when he said that the “responsibility for the Holocaust lay with the Germans.” Netanyahu’s offensive and slanderous contrarian view made during an address to the 37th Zionist Congress, came after a day of violence that saw five Palestinians, including alleged attackers, killed in the occupied territories and an Israeli killed in a traffic incident in the West Bank.
In his speech, Netanyahu focused on incitement, saying Palestinian incitement could be traced back to before the creation of the Israeli state, and claimed that a Palestinian religious leader had encouraged Adolf Hitler to carry out the Holocaust. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, “flew to Berlin,” Netanyahu said. “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.” “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here.’ ‘So what should I do with them?’ he asked. He said, ‘Burn them.”
However, contrary to Netanyahu’s account, there is not a single reference in the entire text of the official record of the conversation between Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin al-Husseini to “Jew burning”. The fact that most Holocaust scholars insist the first death camps were formed before the 1941 meeting between Husseini and Hitler would seem to suggest that Hitler’s plan was already in place by the time they met.
But just as significant, Netanyahu’s lies underscore the secret history that ideologically links Zionism to Hitler fascism. This includes outright collaborations with the Nazis predicated on the notion that the formation of a Zionist state would be part of the system of colonial domination of the rest of the world.
In setting out the Zionist programme, the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl in a 1896 pamphlet called The State of the Jews, called for a Jewish state to be set up in an under developed country outside Europe with the backing of one of the major imperialist powers in order to support the former’s colonizing of it. To achieve this aim the Zionists aligned themselves with notorious anti-Semites that included Count Von Plehve, the sponsor of the worst anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia.
In 1933, The Zionist Federation of Germany sent a memorandum of support to the Nazis and later that year the World Zionist Organization congress defeated a resolution for action against Hitler by a vote of 240 to 43. The author Ralph Schoenman notes in the Hidden History of Zionism:
“Throughout the late thirties and forties, Jewish spokespersons in Europe cried out for help, for public campaigns, for organized resistance, for demonstrations to force the hand of the allied governments – only to be met not merely by Zionist silence but by active Zionist sabotage of the meager efforts which were proposed or prepared in Great Britain and the United States.”
The dirty secret of Zionist history is that Zionism was threatened by the Jews themselves. Defending the Jewish people from persecution meant organizing resistance to the regimes that menaced them. But these regimes embodied the imperial order which comprised the only social force willing or able to impose a settler colony on the Palestinian people. Hence, the Zionists needed the persecution of the Jews to persuade Jews to become colonizers afar, and they needed the persecutors to sponsor the enterprise.
Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first leader, wasn’t satisfied with the arrangement that followed the 1947 partition of the country into separate Jewish and Palestinian states by the leading imperial powers. This was despite the fact that the Jews comprised just 31 per cent of the population but had been given 54 per cent of the fertile land. The end goal for Ben-Gurion and the Zionists was the aspiration towards the establishment of Eretz Yisrael (Greater Israel) – a fascistic concept no different in principle to the aims of the Nazis.
The Zionist project could only be completed if the Palestinians were expelled from their historical homeland. In 1948 this policy was put into effect. Just as Ben-Gurion needed the persecution of the Jews in order to justify his colonization of a foreign land, Netanyahu needs to persuade modern day Israeli Jews of the racist revisionist myth that rejects Hitler’s main responsibility for the Holocaust.
Netanyahu’s outrageous speech effectively lets Hitler off the hook with the aim of putting the blame for the suffering of the Jews and Hitler’s Final Solution on the shoulders of the Palestinian people so as to self-justify his continued obliteration of them.
When in 2005 Iran’s former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, allegedly denied the Holocaust, there was legitimate uproar and worldwide condemnation and media saturation coverage of his comments. This is in sharp contrast to the lack of mainstream media coverage following Netanyahu’s remarks that were no less offensive and outrageous.
Given that Netanyahu underplayed the role Hitler played in the Holocaust, neither he, nor his fellow Jewish extremist fundamentalists, have any wriggle room with which to critique, with any credibility, Holocaust deniers ever again.
**WARNING: Listener discretion is advised. Potentially offensive/graphic content.**
In our sixth podcast, Fritz Berg and I discuss the mainstream Holocaust narrative vs. the (Neo)Revisionist narrative. We also talk about various sociopolitical topics and current events, from the Jewish declaration of war against “Hitler Germany” to today’s #EUMigrantCrisis. Loaded with one-of-a-kind analysis and insight, you are guaranteed to hear something you have never heard before in this epic 2-part podcast. Have a listen!! (John was unable to participate in this episode owing to Hurricane Irma, but we were in contact throughout the storm. No worries, he’s safe but still without power. And he even edited this entire podcast during the storm!!)
Unfortunately, my recording software cut off while Fritz and I were discussing the language used in Himmler’s Posen speech, color video footage of the Holocaust deceased (and how none of the bodies were RED), as well as additional Goebbels’ diaries/Crystal Night and Jewish evacuation information, but most of this is (fortunately) covered in detail in our book “Crystal Night, 1938: Nazi Pogrom or Zionist Scheme?: An Investigative Analysis”: https://amazon.com/dp/1540692175/and in the following discussion thread on RODOH: https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=3028. For those who are interested in these details, please check out our book and these links.
“Although the given “official” story (perfected long after the war) was that “gassings had stopped in Nov. 1944” — what is the basis for such a claim — by Hilberg or anyone?…
Why would the Nazis have stopped their homicidal gassings when the enemy was so near to defeating them–and so likely to interview countless Jewish “survivors” for their unique horror stories? Why leave any Jewish “survivors” alive at all? So, try to find the document ordering that “gassings be stopped in November, 1944.” Hilberg NEVER found any such document and neither did…anyone else…In any event, autopsies are…enormously important for exposing the holocaust. No doubt, the autopsies we know about are a major reason why Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau have all been dropped as places where gassings might have occurred–even though any “gassings” might have simply been halted a few months before war’s end just like at Auschwitz supposedly.”
My response: It is super curious why NO autopsies were ever conducted on any bodies discovered at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Why not?
**The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of Wilk Mocy Publishers or its direct or indirect affiliates.**
Below is a comment posted on a neo-nazi blog by (Trad)revisionist Carlos W. Porter, which was copied & pasted and sent to me via email.
In our fifth podcast, John and I discuss several aspects of World War II, including Hitler’s invasion of Poland (Schultze-Rhonhof vs. Dieter-Müller) and Stalin’s offensive plan against Eastern Europe/Poland (the Pleshakov thesis). We also cover a range of sociopolitical topics and current events, from the Anglin-Gab fiasco to Alex Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory (yes, again!). Loaded with unsurpassed analysis, this episode is certainly not lacking in entertainment value. Have a listen.
You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!
Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 5(1) – 09/06/2017
Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 5(2) – 09/06/2017
According to Serge Bile, Carlos Greykey, a Black man who was interned at Mauthausen by the Nazis, had fought for the Communists in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. This, and not his race, is why he was interned in a German KZ (concentration camp). Needless to say, he survived the war.
To learn more about Mr. Greykey and other Black people under Nazi rule, get our fully revised, reformatted & updated Wilk Mocy printing of “THE OTHER NAZIS” in softcover on Amazon today: https://amazon.com/dp/1546476792/
Why is the Black Nazis book series and thesis so controversial to so many? Why have extremists on both the left and right attacked the author’s premise with such indignant ferocity? This concise interview conducted by Ernest Young of Germany’s Zuerst! magazine of author Veronica K. Clark answers these questions in a listener-friendly interview. One of a kind, straight to the point, and loaded with rare factual tidbits, no listener will come away from this book without having learned something new and intriguing about racial relations in the Third Reich and the German military establishment.
You may also get our fully revised, reformatted & updated Wilk Mocy printing of “THE CONTROVERSY OF BLACK NAZIS II” in softcover on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/1483954072/
In our fourth podcast, John and I discuss several Wilk Mocy updates as well as sociopolitical topics, from the Anglin-Johnson discussion to Alex Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory. Yay or nay? You decide!!
You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!
Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 4 – 08/31/2017
In our third ever podcast, John and I discuss an array of relevant #Real3R topics, from the latest Antifa cray at Berkeley to the bizarre persecution of Mr. Christopher Cantwell in the name of “epistemic privilege”. Please don’t be dissuaded from listening if you’re more of a current events and/or human drama fan, we discuss lots of the latest! Don’t miss out!
While watching the recent events in Charlottesville, Virginia – the violence that erupted between marching neo-Nazis and Antifa protesters – I can’t help but think back to what was the original “Antifa”, a group of Jews, whom my father told me about from his childhood, growing up as a poor Jewish kid in Newark, New Jersey.
My father was born in 1904 in what was then Kishinev, Russia, and what is now Chisinau, Moldova. Before he was a year old, his family immigrated to the US. Like many Jewish families at the time, they were fleeing the murderous atmosphere created by the Kishinev pogrom of 1903. My dad grew up in the tenements of Newark, without much money but with a wealth of stories about the characters and goings on of the Jewish neighborhoods of Newark of that era.
The Antifa’s role in fighting Nazis in the streets reminded me of my dad’s story about his much beloved but “kind of crooked” first cousin, Jake “Cocky Jake” (and sometimes, “Jack”) Rothseid.
Cocky Jake was the black sheep of the family, a guy who was connected with the Jewish mob that ran Newark in the 1930’s. It wasn’t that Jake was a hit man who ran around killing people; he wasn’t exactly Bugsy Siegel, Meyer Lansky, or Dutch Schultz. He was more like the local neighborhood wise guy. He was the guy who knew a guy who knew another guy who could get things “taken care of” when legal remedies were not feasible.
My father always told me that the only time his family was ever really proud of Jake, given his line of work, was when they heard that he’d been involved with busting up pro-Nazi rallies in Newark that were taking place shortly prior to US entry into World War II.
In the late 1930’s, there was a legal pro-Nazi movement called the German-American Bund. The Bund started having large rallies in North Jersey and elsewhere, with the goal of keeping the US from entering World War II on the side of the allies. Most Americans of the time were deeply isolationist. The last thing they wanted to do was send American boys to fight and die in another European war. So the Bund’s activities were not that surprising, and found fertile ground in many quarters. But the local Jewish population was alarmed by the pro-Nazi rhetoric of the Bund, not to mention the sight of brown-shirted activists chanting and sharing Nazi salutes right here in the good old USA.
The leading lights of the Jewish community asked the local police and Sherriff’s offices to stop these gatherings, but, getting no help, decided to raise the matter to a higher authority. They appealed for protection to the Jewish mob boss of Newark, Abner “Longie” Zwillman. Zwillman agreed to help. He had his chief enforcer, ex-prize fighter Sidney Nathan Abramowitz (better known as “Nat Arno”, the name by which he is immortalized in the New Jersey Boxing Hall of Fame) organize a “civil rights group”, which they called “the Minutemen.”
My cousin Cocky Jake was a card-carrying member of the Minutemen, and his picture appears in newspaper accounts of the day. The Minutemen were essentially an armed group of Jewish mobsters, thugs, and wise guys like Jake. When Nat Arno gave the word that the Nazis were assembling, these denizens of the saloons, pool halls and other dens of iniquity in North Jersey would leave their usual haunts and head to the Nazi rallies. Much like today’s Antifa, the Minutemen’s preferred tools of persuasion were not logic and reason, but baseball bats, brass knuckles, rubber coated pipes and the occasional stink bomb.
The Minutemen were largely successful. Most of these pro-Nazi rallies were broken up before they got started. And the Nazis managed to get away with just a few broken bones and bruises, as Longie had decreed that no one was to be killed during these events.
Immediately after Pearl Harbor, these pro-Nazi organizations were declared illegal, and the Minutemen were able to disband and return to their usual less-than-savory activities. Years later, it was discovered that the German American Bund organizations of the time were not purely local in nature; according to an investigation by the House Un-American Activities Committee, chaired by Martin Dies, there was clear evidence that the Bund had ties to the Third Reich.
My father is long gone, as are Cocky Jake and his friends in the Minutemen, Longie Zwillman, and the rest of the characters that ran the Jewish mob in Newark back then.
Unfortunately, it seems that the Nazis are still around, but then, so are the people resisting them on the streets. I wonder if the members of today’s Antifa would be surprised to learn that they are replicating a proud lineage of Jewish gangsters who, years ago, took a brief respite from the rackets and the pool halls to do some good for a change.
I’m not sure if there’s a heaven for wise guys. Even if there is, my guess is they’d have to check their baseball bats and brass knuckles at the door. But I like to think that somewhere, Cocky Jake is looking down at all this and thinking, “Give ‘em one for me, kid.”
In our second ever podcast, John and I discuss a range of relevant #Real3R topics, from Hitler’s support for Zionism to the arbitrary treatment of black people in the Nazi state. Please don’t be dissuaded from listening if you’re more of a current events and/or human drama fan, we also discuss the latest on DS, the WN movement, and more! You don’t want to miss this!
You can help support this podcast with just a dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!
Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 2 – 08/21/2017
In our first ever podcast, John and I discuss the pros and cons of #Charlottesville. We explore both confirmed and suspected macro-level developments leading up to this event, drawing upon our knowledge of, and interest in, World War II, as well as select intended and unintended consequences of this event. Please send us your thoughts, contributions and/or reactions on Twitter, Gab or via email.
You can help support this podcast with just a dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!
**UPDATE** So, the following Tweet, purportedly tweeted out by Mr. Kessler himself, has left Wilk Mocy Publishers with no other choice but to publicly condemn and disavow Mr. Kessler and everything he appears to stand for:
Alt-Reichers, like Mr. Kessler here, within the Alt-Right movement face serious problems. First, Hitler was a founding father of Israel. He fully supported Zionism. His motives for doing so are irrelevant. Yet, 99.99% of Alt-Reichers are anti-Israel and anti-Zionist. Care to explain your hypocrisy and blatant Hitler apologia? Two, these same Alt-Reichers think they can do & achieve what not even real Nazis could do & achieve; what not even Hitler himself could do & achieve. I will debate any Alt-Reicher at any time on these issues.
The unvarnished truth is that Nazism broke down under the combined force of political and military pressure. Tis an error to attempt a repeat of a failed worldview and movement. The Nazis could not maintain their initial racial ideology and policies nor their imperial agenda. They failed.
Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 1 – 08/16/2017
Israeli leader criticized for response to Charlottesville
JERUSALEM — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came under mounting pressure on Thursday to speak out against President Donald Trump’s response to the racially charged violence and anti-Semitic outpouring in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Netanyahu’s near silence on the march staged by anti-Semitic white nationalists — and Trump’s assertion that “both sides” were responsible for the violence — appears to reflect the Israeli leader’s desire to remain in the good graces of the embattled U.S. president.
But Netanyahu’s reluctance to speak out on such an important issue has set him apart from the growing ranks of Israeli leaders who have been outspoken in their anger, and risks alienating Jewish American leaders already estranged by certain Israeli policies.
A growing chorus of opposition politicians, commentators and even coalition partners has urged Netanyahu to take a stronger stance, even at the risk of antagonizing the president.
Trump has acknowledged there were some “very bad people” at Saturday’s rally, where a woman was killed when a car slammed into a crowd of counter-protesters. But he also said there were “very fine people” on both sides. The president’s equation of extremist hate groups and left-wing demonstrators brought condemnation from across the American political spectrum.
Though Netanyahu, who views himself as a leader of world Jewry, is ordinarily quick to rail against anti-Semitism, he waited three days to react to the violence in Charlottesville with a relatively tepid statement on Twitter.
“Outraged by expressions of anti-Semitism, neo-Nazism and racism. Everyone should oppose this hatred,” he tweeted, avoiding any mention of the president or Charlottesville. No such statement was issued in Hebrew, the state’s official language and the first language of most Israelis.
My comment: I’m very impressed with Mr. Netanyahu in this regard. He’s more supportive of #POTUSTrump than the American GOP! These two leaders, and the Visegrad 4 (V4) Group, appear to be the only leaders with enough rocks to stand up to pervasive Liberalism. If every Jewish leader and power figure reacted like Mr. Netanyahu here, anti-Semitism wouldn’t exist. The Liberal-Socialist Jewzis could learn a thing or two from the Israeli PM. Hand it like Beata, Bibi:
Netanyahu’s spokesman David Keyes said the prime minister’s statement was “unequivocal,” adding that he didn’t expect any further comment.
“I think he made his view on the repugnancy of any neo-Nazism abundantly clear,” Keyes said.
After clashing with President Barack Obama for eight years, Netanyahu welcomed the election of Trump, and he has worked to cultivate a strong relationship with the White House. Trump was warmly welcomed during a brief visit to Israel in May.
Sima Kadmon, with the Hebrew daily Yedioth Ahronoth, wrote on Thursday that after Netanyahu turned Trump “into the greatest friend of Israel in history — how can Netanyahu now issue a condemnation and talk about an anti-Semitic and racist president?”
“He does not want to alienate Trump,” said Eytan Gilboa, an expert on U.S.-Israeli relations at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University. But in the process, Gilboa said, Netanyahu is pushing American Jews further away.
Trump’s handling of the events in Charlottesville has begun to attract concern and criticism in Israel, even among politicians who admire him.
Immediately after Saturday’s march, Education Minister Naftali Bennett, leader of the nationalist Jewish Home party, said the waving of Nazi flags and symbols was not only offensive to American Jews, but also disrespected the memory of American soldiers who died fighting the Nazis during World War II.
“The leaders of the U.S. must condemn and denounce the displays of anti-Semitism seen over the past few days,” Bennett said.
On Wednesday, Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, a member of Netanyahu’s Likud Party, sent a letter to the head of a major U.S. Jewish group expressing shock that “the most vicious symbol of anti-Semitism” was being paraded in American streets. “I know that the great nation of the United States of America and its leaders will know how to face this difficult challenge,” Rivlin said.
On Thursday, Deputy Defense Minister Eli Ben-Dahan, a member of the Jewish Home party, said Israel “must not stammer or hesitate in the face of anti-Semitism,” and leveled a veiled criticism of Netanyahu, saying “apparently some don’t want to enrage Trump.”
Opposition politicians have been more strident and open in their criticism of Trump.
“When it comes to racism, anti-Semitism and Nazism, there aren’t two equal sides — there’s good and there’s bad. Period,” said Tzipi Livni, a former foreign minister. She said Thursday that it seemed Netanyahu’s silence stems from his fear of angering Trump.
Lawmaker Shelly Yachimovich, a former Israeli opposition leader, came out swinging against Netanyahu for not speaking out against Trump.
“And you, prime minister of the Jewish people in their land, who warns us about the Holocaust every Monday and Thursday, with overdoses of fear and arrogance and weeks of ‘Never Again,’ what about you?” Yachimovich wrote on Facebook.
Netanyahu’s Facebook and Twitter feeds bore no mention of Charlottesville amid the slew of photos of the prime minister and his wife arm-in-arm on their vacation on the shore of the Sea of Galilee.
Netanyahu’s son Yair, however, who has a close relationship with his father, caused a public outcry when he appeared to parrot Trump’s sentiments. He wrote a Facebook post Wednesday saying the “neo nazis scums in Virginia” are a dying breed, but left-wing anti-fascist and Black Lives Matter groups, who he said hate Israel “just as much,” are “getting stronger and stronger and becoming super dominant in American universities and public life.”
My comment: Yair might want to rethink his particularly vicious rhetoric hurled at white patriots and white survival advocates who are NOT “neo nazis” or “scum.” Yair appears unaware that fascism came to America under the guise of anti-fascism. Yair should acknowledge that #WhitesAreTheNewJews. Check it:
#AmericaIsJustLikeNaziGermany. Check it:
American Jewish leaders have expressed deep disappointment with Trump. But if Netanyahu continues to remain quiet, that disappointment could quickly spread to him as well. Leaders of liberal Jewish groups, who represent the vast majority of American Jews, are already at odds with the Israeli government over issues such as egalitarian prayer and recognition of religious conversions.
Rabbi Thomas Gutherz, senior rabbi of Congregation Beth Israel of Charlottesville, said he has been too preoccupied with the events in his community to pay attention to the news in Israel. But Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the liberal Union for Reform Judaism, the largest American synagogue movement, said the prime minister “did harm to the cause of Israel and the cause of the Jewish people by having such a delayed reaction.”
Jacobs said he was particularly surprised by Netanyahu’s slow response. “Three days went by without a full-throated condemnation. It was quite distressing,” Jacobs said.
AP correspondent Rachel Zoll in New York contributed reporting.