Related original Third Reich publication promoting Jewish emigration:
VERY RARE ORIGINAL 1939 GUIDE FOR JEWS
HOW TO LEAVE THE GERMAN THIRD REICH
TO AUSTRALIA AND OTHER COUNTRIES OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE PUBLISHED BY THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IN BERLIN!
This unique 9-1/4 x 12-1/2 inches item with 88 pages is probably one of the last publications which was printed by the Reichsvereinigung der Juden in Deutschland (Reichs association of the Jews in Germany)! It was printed only in a number of 10,000 copies and probably only a handful have survived! It is a detailed guide on how to legally emigrate from Hitler-Germany to a foreign country which is not (yet) ruled by a National Socialist and antisemitic government! This extremely interesting historic item was printed 1939 by the Jüdischer Kulturbund in Deutschland e.V., Abteilung Verlag in Berlin (Jewish cultural association in Germany, publishing division in Berlin). They were located in the Meinekestrasse in the center of Berlin and their building was probably confiscated only shortly after this guide was published.
The book is divided into two main chapters. The first chapter contains general information on the climate in the different regions of the world, the differences in housekeeping, etc. under these new conditions. Chapter two is on the emigration laws, life (especially pointed out the Jewish life!) in Australia, New Zealand, Kenya, Rhodesia, British India and Canada. A smaller chapter also deals about the Jewish emigration to the United States of America. Mentioned are also helpful books which give advice on how to succeed in a foreign country. There are lots of very interesting advertisings, all from Jewish companies, all on the subject of moving, transportation, agents who would help with the immigration process, etc.
According to the Nazi racial laws every male Jew had to add the name Israel and every female the name Sara, this can be seen on the advertisings below.
by Weronika Kuzniar (V. K. Clark)
Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source. There, I said it. And I’m not just saying this to evoke a reaction. I’m saying it because I really mean it. The renowned “Hitler expert” Lord Dacre, better known as Hugh Trevor-Roper, knowingly and willingly engaged in a massive cover-up regarding Hitler’s Table Talk (hereafter TT).
Had it not been for the outstanding research at the low cost of just $50 taken up by historian Richard Carrier, we might still be in the dark about this, 64 years after TT’s first appearance in the English language. Sorry to bust this bubble, Hitler and Third Reich enthusiasts, but TT is worthless.
In this article, I establish three things: 1) that Hugh Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in academic fraud for profit and prestige, 2) that TT is a worthless primary source, and 3) that renowned Hitler “experts”, both Revisionist and Mainstream, have failed the public regarding reliable Hitler primary sources.
A fake Hitler quote cited by Irmin Vinson on Greg Johnson’s Counter-Currents website:
#1 NEW RELEASE ON AMAZON IN “HISTORIOGRAPHY” (7/2-7/3/17 & 7/14/17)
Read the FREE abridged PDF online (my original contributions to this research pertain to Mr. David Irving and Werner Koeppen): Table-Talk-Debunked-VK-Clark-2017
Just $15.99 for the updated & expanded softcover on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/1548258768/
Or, get it on audiobook: https://amazon.com/dp/B076FDPHFN/
**6/24 UPDATE** The text comparisons have commenced on my end and the results are stunning!
First, we have here Henry Picker’s December 13, 1941 entry (based on the “original” notes of Heinrich Heim before he [Heim] modified and expanded them[!!; op. cit. Nilsson]):
Henry Picker on December 13, 1941 (mittags):
“Es ist gut, dass ich die Pfaffen nicht hineingelassen habe in die Partei. Am 21. März 1933 – Potsdam – war die Frage: Kirche oder nicht Kirche? Ich hatte den Staat gegen den Fluch der beiden Konfessionen erodbert. Wenn ich damals angefangen hätte, mich der Kirche zu bedienen – wir sind an die Gräber gegangen, während die Männer des Staates in der Kirche waren–, so wurde ich heute das Schicksal des Duce teilen. Für sich ist er ein Freigeist. Aber er hat mit Konzessionen begonnen… Ich wurde im Vatikan einmarschieren und die ganze Gesellschaft herausholen. Ich würde dann sagen: “Verzeihung, ich habe mich geirrt!” – Aber sie wären weg!”
“It is good that I did not let priests into the party. On 21 March 1933 – Potsdam – the question was: Church or no church? I had conquered the state despite the curse of the two confessions. If I had begun to serve the church — we went to the graves, while the men of the state were in the church — I would now be sharing the fate of the Duce. He is a free-thinker. But he has initiated [begun with] concessions … I would enter the Vatican and throw the whole lot of them out. I’d say, “Excuse me, I’ve been wrong!” – But they would [already] have been out [gone]!”
Source and original entry (13 December 1941, mittags):
Next, we have Heinrich Heim’s modified and expanded version of his own notes purportedly taken down on December 13, 1941 (mittags), which were (unbeknown to Heim) hijacked by Mr. Picker and published as his own in the book above! (We have Mr. Picker to thank for inadvertently exposing Heim as a fabricator in this respect; op. cit. Carrier)
Heim’s modified entry for the same day of 13 December 1941 (mittags):
And the softcover English translation, which, like Heim, adds much content to the original one paragraph entry:
And then we have the following divergent notes from Werner Koeppen, who John Toland (on p. 682 in https://www.amazon.com/dp/0385420536) wrote had “furtively jotted down notes” on a paper napkin as Hitler spoke. Well, if Koeppen furtively jotted notes, then how come he had so much less content than Heim (above) and such different content than both Picker and Heim?
Some of Koeppen’s 9/18/1941 notes (my translation):
Little of Koeppen’s content matches Heim’s. It should match Heim’s entry more closely as far as theme and subject matter if both men furtively took verbatim notes as Hitler spoke to them. In fact, they ought to be identical. But the very different content suggests a lot of omission and divergence on both men’s parts. Not okay for a steno reporter! The only thing we can say for sure after comparing Koeppen’s September 17th (not posted here, but is in my book) through 18th entries is that a general discussion of the eastern front and Reichskommissariat Ukraine took place. Nothing more. We have no idea what Hitler actually said or did not say. The entries agree only in the most general sense. (E.g., Heim features Hitler calling the Slavs “a mass of born slaves” and Koeppen does not.)
Here is Heim’s entry for that day (September 17th to the 18th):
Lastly, the entry of January 18, 1942 (nachts) suffices as the final blow to Heim’s credibility as a reliable steno reporter. Compare Mr. Picker’s hijacked Heim notes with those later expanded and amended by Heim (unbeknown to Picker).
Picker’s hijacked Heim entry (18. Januar 1942, nachts):
Heim’s entry for the exact same time/day (18./19. Januar 1942, nachts):
All updates and textual comparisons have been added to my book.
POWERWOLF PODCASTS ON HTT
Now available!! https://wilkmocy.com/?p=10128
Singer Germaine Lubin pictured with conductor Herbert von Karajan, who was a member of the NSDAP.
Germaine Lubin, of Guyanese origin, was a super-star of the time. She was even admired by Adolf Hitler, who complimented her stage performance overlooking the non-German blood flowing in her veins.
In 1943, Lubin, accompanied by the Orchestra of Berlin directed by Karajan, sang “Isolde” in Paris to an audience of German dignitaries. The Red (Commie) Resistance did not forget this.
“Hitler’s Table Talk” Exploded!!
We cover Hitlerian Zionism, “education” in Nazi Germany & our goals
An outstanding lecture about Jewish warriors and heroes of the Reich.
Hitler Worship is as dangerous as Holocaust Worship. Here’s why.
I am going to address this commentary in an upcoming Powerwolf Podcast. In the meantime, please take some time to contemplate it.
By M. M.
The Polish guilt for the outbreak of WW2 is a minor one in terms of geo-political situation. Poland was only used as a pawn, as a “proxy” by the British, who made use of us without however helping us in any way. Poland did not wish to invade Germany – that is: to invade on her own, risking defeat. The Polish leaders (both political and military) knew all too well that such combat would have ended in a suicide…
IF they ever considered a war against the Germans, then only in alliance with other powers, chiefly France (not even Britain so much, because in the past the British tended to be pro-German rather than pro-Polish).
But the French cautioned the Polish government, stressing that Poland, in any dispute with Germany, should either seek an understanding with her or seek assistance from the USSR. The Poles had no illusion then as to France’s “readiness” for war with Germany. As a side-note to this part, I can mention that the French foreign minister of the time was writing a diary in which he wrote among others that any war in Europe would benefit the Soviets first and foremost. When he was interrogated in 1945, he brought his diary to the “hearing” and after that he was left alone. His “inquisitors” could read his remarks which – then, in 1945, must have sent some chill to their spines because in 1945 the USSR (herself and through her political block in Europe) was much closer to France than she had ever been before…
When Ribbentrop presented the Poles with the German set of proposals regarding bilateral relations (end of October 1938, just after it was decided that Sudetenland was about to be incorporated to Germany), the Poles did not respond but indicated that the German proposals could lead to an understanding between both states. And so they lulled the Germans into believing that an understanding was indeed a foregone conclusion. But this move (chiefly by our foreign minister, colonel Józef Beck) was made only to win time while simultaneously an effort was made to mobilize the French and the British. About the French I already wrote here above.
After less than half a year later, at the end of March 1939 the British gave us their “guarantees”. These immediately changed the Polish attitude from half-friendly to openly hostile towards Germany. In the entire time since end of October 1938 till the end of August 1939 the Polish government DID NOT engage in ANY direct talks with Germany: neither regarding the Danzig question, nor the German proposal of extraterritorial highway and railway roads (for Germany in the Polish “Corridor” in Pomerania and for Poland in Danzig), nor regarding Polish membership in the Anti-Comintern Pact, nor even in the vital (for us) question of an extension of the non-aggression pact (1934) for 20 years. Altogether the German proposals consisted of 18 points – and it would be indeed a strange occurrence if among so many points the Polish diplomats were unable to find even ONE worthy of being negotiated – for I am not suggesting that they would have to accept everything without negotiation!
What was worse, however, with the time passing, the Polish government embarked on ( in an unprecedented scale ) persecution of the German minority in Poland. One can point to the fact that the Germans themselves responded with similar measures of their own, but one has to admit that the Polish moves were more abrasive and aggressive. Not hundreds but thousands of ethnic Germans were arrested and forcibly resettled to Poland’s eastern provinces, many were kept in prisons (later, during the campaign in Poland, the German army was sometimes finding those kidnapped people in various parts of our country, and they themselves had sometimes terrible stories to tell about the “nature” of treatment applied by our authorities. Now it is being openly sometimes retold in Poland (by Polish media) and many still cannot believe the kind of barbarism these stories contain.
I am sometimes, for instance in exchanges with some Germans, stressing that all these measures SHOULD NOT have given any ground whatsoever to any full-scale invasion of our country. But we know that, historically, wars broke out for reasons far lesser than these – like the war in Latin America in 1961 because of a… soccer game…
One possible explanation of these brutal measures could be that the Polish government DID NOT believe that Hitler – faced with the British “guarantees” combined with Polish resolve – would dare to attack us. It was a very popular slogan at the time that “Hitler will not dare to start a war against us”. The later events proved all this type of thinking completely wrong…
it was indeed a strange situation: states stronger than ours were not willing to engage in warfare (Britain, USSR, Italy, France) while Poland, who needed peace more than any of them, was demonstratively ready to engage in it at any given time. I say “demonstratively”, because it seems to have been a kind of diplomatic game, where hopes were kept alive that Hitler will “dare to to nothing” and this could even (in our leaders’ vivid imagination of course…) lead to an opposition in Germany which would end in toppling of Hitler’s government, perhaps even in a German anti-Nazi “revolution”…
When the French foreign minister called the Polish ambassador, Łukasiewicz, to his office and tried to explain to him the seriousness of the situation in which the German Wehrmacht might march into Poland, Łukasiewicz responded adamantly, that no, the opposite would happen: the Polish army would march into Germany, Berlin would be taken in a few days and Eastern Prussia occupied within a week… The French minister gave up at that point…
The Poles were not about to start any fully blown war against the Germans, but the recklessness of our leadership only provoked Hitler to make his move, the more so that there was one particular state in Europe that simply could not wait to attack us as well: Stalin’s Soviet Union…
The Brits seemed to have wanted a war, but such one in which they would not have participate from the beginning but could force the scales of war go their way later on, when everybody else was exhausted.
The Brits sent their general, namely general Ironside to Poland for a visit to the Polish army. While in Poland, Ironside was praising our preparedness etc, our strength, our resolve and bravery, organization and military training. As soon he set foot on the British soil, he started talking differently to his government, leaving no doubt that what he really thought was absolutely, totally and definitely different to what he was saying in Poland publicly…
Openly the Brits were praising us and making newsreels like the one to which I am giving a link here (below). But in reality they had no doubt whatsoever that Poland would be crushed.
Their (and the American) hypocrisy did not end there. As you know, on the 23rd of August 1939 the USSR and Germany signed their non-aggression pact (called the “Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact”). To this pact a special document was added, the secret protocol, in which both sides agreed to divide Poland int two spheres of interest (what we sometimes call the “Fourth Partition of Poland”…). The text of the protocol was not made public of course, be we now know that someone from the German embassy in Moscow made that text available to the British and American diplomats. Neither the Americans, nor even our new allies, the British (the Polish-British alliance was signed formally on 25 August 1939…) had ever informed the Polish government about the protocol, they never warned us. Yes, they wanted the war to break out and they most apparently feared that once the Poles knew what was going on, they might have decided to change their policy in order to protect their country from a war for which they have not been prepared at all…
My detractors have yet to seriously challenge my thesis…
Black Nazis III: https://amazon.com/Black-Nazis-III-Minorities-Foreigners/dp/1515178676
Hitler’s Most Significant Speech: https://amazon.com/Hitlers-Most-Significant-Speech-Collectors/dp/1507618654/