Tag Archives: Adolf Hitler

Mixed-Race Germans: Nordicism Discredited

This excerpt from Nation & Race is Copyright©2014-2017 Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Get this book on Amazon today (2nd ed.): https://amazon.com/Nation-Race-Warwolves-Iron-Cross/dp/1517253322

First ed.: https://amazon.com/Warwolves-Iron-Cross-Nation-Wehrwolf/dp/1507845995


ALBRECHT WIRTH WAS AMONG those who detailed Germans’ multiraciality. He argued that Germans were originally composed of “Celtic, Lithuanian, Germanic and Slavic blood, then Romans, Jews, Huguenots and Italians, with a smattering of Swedes, Scots, Croats, Irish, Hungarians, Spaniards and Turks.”[1] Was this hybridity the reason for Germany having been so deeply divided for so long? For Germany having no single economic, cultural or political center until the advent of National Socialism?

Hutton suggests that in order to successfully overcome these divisions, an “operational conception” of Germanness had to be adopted by the Nazis. What Hitler came up with was nothing short of brilliant: we must recognize the importance of race as it relates to the German people, and secondly, we must acknowledge the presence of the Aryan which unites us all in a common bond. This operational definition of Germanness was initially workable, but over time it faced serious challenges to its validity and applicability. The Aryan concept yielded to the Nordic concept which then gave way to the more inclusive German-blooded concept. Hitler’s main concern was the creation of a Party and accompanying doctrine that could rival Marxism in its influence and ability to unite. This is why there was initially little tolerance for varied viewpoints. No movement was going to break Marxism’s appeal unless it was as intolerant and dogmatic as Marxism: hence the Aryan-Nordic cultism of the early NSDAP.


We will now delve further into the academic tensions of Third Reich racial discourse: for example, the battle between racial anthropologists and linguists. The problem with the linguistic approach to defining the German Volk was that it allowed inclusion of aliens whom were racially too far removed from the Germans, so much so that their inclusion would probably not result in harmonious assimilation and acculturation. These racial aliens were almost always Negroes, Jews and Gypsies. In addition, German racial anthropologists had a point when they declared that no one could mistake a Mongol for a black man or a Chinese man for a white man. The differences were apparent. What the racial anthropologists struggled with was defining the German in positive terms. How were they to differentiate Germans from the Jews living among them, for example? This difficult task of racial differentiation, which was ultimately biopsychosocial, is what led to the Nuremberg Laws. The only way to determine what was German was to exclude what was obviously or reasonably not German. In application, this meant exclusion of the majority of black Germans, Gypsies and Jews from Germanhood.

Contrary to NS propaganda, Nazi theorists, like most mainstream intellectuals at that time, acknowledged the mixed-race state of the German people. The central problem they dealt with was not determining what constituted the German race (deutsche Rasse) – a term that was rejected by the majority of German academicians and politicians alike – but which races made up the German Volk and which should be allowed to continue to infuse new blood into this Volk. Most Nazi theorists argued that the Germans were composed of some six different races and that some of these races created harmonious mixtures that surpassed the achievement and cultural levels of the two original stocks from whence they were derived.

One example that was frequently cited as superior to the Nordic element by itself was the Nordic-Alpine hybrid. Ernst Kretschmer said that while these two race cores were very different, they nevertheless mixed harmoniously. According to Max Gerstenhauer, the Alpine race resulted from “pure” Germanics interbreeding with the indigenous slaves. He did not view this mixing kindly and asserted that Germans had lost “racial quality” as a result. Gerstenhauer was ostensibly dismayed by the fact that the German Volk was only 2/3 Germanic; the other 1/3 consisted of Alpine non-Germanics. Juxtaposed to this trajectory was the thesis of Walter Goetz, who argued that “racial mixing was a prerequisite for the greatest human achievements.”[2] Hermann Muckermann avowed that “the contribution of the Nordic race was at its greatest where it had mixed in a harmonious way with other compatible racial groups,” such as the Dinaric, Alpine and Phalian races. Robert Gradmann argued that the Nordic-East Baltic mixture of northern Europe resulted in the blond-haired population there. Eugen Fischer suggested that the German Volkhad benefited” from the different European peoples mixing with one another. Fischer also avered that “…many of the great Germans had come from racially mixed areas of Germany, [and] that the Nordic race in its pure state had not achieved as much as in a mixed state. There were examples of gifted Mischlinge, such as Pushkin [part-black] and Booker T. Washington [also part black].” He therefore concluded that the Germans were fortunate to have benefited from the Nordic race, but “also from the other racial elements…” Wilhelm Schmidt asserted that race-mixing between the Hamitic and Nordic peoples “gave the Nordic race its special advantage, giving it both its conquering attributes, and, to a lesser degree, the artistic gifts of totemistic town-dwellers, as well as in a great measure the thoroughness, seriousness and conscientiousness of the matriarchal agricultural people.”[3] In addition, Schmidt argued that the Nordic race’s oldest links “stretched deep into Africa and Asia.” If accurate, this negates the argument that the Nordics were “racially pure” and that Scandinavia was their birthplace as a race. Hans Günther regularly depicted the Alpine race as the “ugliest” in his various publications. In an attack on Günther, race dynamic theorist Friedrich Merkenschlager stated that southern Germans bore “up to 80 per cent ‘yellow blood’ from the Mongol race.”[4] Otto Hauser wrote that the Alpine was the result of the Nordic race crossing with the Polar (yellow) race. Furthermore, he claimed that the Mediterranean race was the result of the Negro mixing with the Nordic. If correct, this means that a “bastardized, negrified” race surpassed the civilizational level of the “pure Nordics” in Scandinavia. Classical Greece and Rome were both Mediterranean products, not Nordo-Scandinavian products.


In the end the Nordicists were not only forced to come to terms with racial mixing, but they also conceded that the Nordic race was “frequently understood as related to, or hybridized with, the Phalian race.”[5] Notions of race purity were irretrievably out the door. (As an aside, “even the most liberal lines of racial anthropology were unable to distance themselves from the notion that the ‘Negro’ was essentially inferior. This assumption was built into the foundations of that academic science from the very beginning.”[6])

Another important thing to understand about this time period is that German academics and policymakers were worried about the fall of German civilization. Since Darwin’s evolutionary theory was taken so seriously in Germany, intellectuals feared that German civilization was doomed to collapse like all the great civilations before it. And of course with that collapse would go the German Volk. But the perceived ability to reverse Germandom’s decay and eventual collapse into oblivion via eugenics rekindled these racial pessimists’ hopes. Eugenics was one tool among several that offered a solution to Germany’s racio-cultural quandary. If only the best Germans were permitted to have children, then much of Germany’s degeneration could be halted and even reversed. The Nordicists saw in eugenics the promise of re-breeding a Nordo-German upper class which could then rule over all the “bastardized” and “racially degenerated” masses of Germans, eventually improving the German people overall. Fortunately such wild breeding schemes were never realized under the Nazi government and as a matter of fact Walter Schultze

stressed that there was no programme to ‘breed’ an ideal tall, narrow-faced, blue-eyed, blond type; no hereditarily healthy member of the German Volk should feel second-class or inferior on account of lacking these features. It was the psychology, the morality, the personality of the individual that counted, and the inheritance of external physical characteristics was a matter of secondary importance. The idea that racial policies took as their ideal a particular physical type was misinformation spread by the enemies of National Socialism.”[7]

The real threat to the German Volk was not the Jews per se, but “the losses of territory and vitality, rising assimilation into other nations [such as America] and the lack of internal unity.” Georg Schmidt-Rohr, a theorist who came under official fire but was later rehabilitated by the Race Policy Office in 1939, argued that “[t]hese problems could not be solved by persecuting Jews as an outlet for the embittered discontent of the masses: cheap anti-Semitism was no solution.”[8] Rohr stressed the importance of the German language in maintaining German identity worldwide. If Germans began speaking English, Spanish, etc., then they would slowly lose their attachment to their Germanness. And that is in fact what happened to many a German before, during and after World War II. Germans abroad were amongst the most numerous and unswerving enemies of the Reich, whether they were Polish, British or American. Himmler even remarked on this problem of ‘lost Germans’ in his Top Secret Posen speech of 24 October 1943 (see hitler & himmler UNCENSORED).

Jewish International vs. Nordic International

Perhaps even more interesting than Clauss’s insights was the idea that the Nordic race component was at war with the Jewish race component. The two were seen by certain Nordicists as twins, one good and one evil, and these twins were vying for world domination. There was in fact a “curious, half-repressed racial link” shared between the Jews and the Germans, as both “shared a partial origin in the Near Eastern race.”[18] But there was a fundamental difference between these two twins that made the Jew the stronger and more influential: the Jewish twin required no physical territory to thrive and in fact flourished in modernity and the urban realm. The Jewish twin could claim his written history (the Talmud and Torah) as the basis of his collective identity, so there was no need for a territorial one. The Nordic twin, on the other hand, had no recorded history with which to identify and was therefore only at home when he was tied to his land, nature and a rural existence. He could not contend with modernity and in fact went wayward when exposed to such a context. What’s more, the Jewish twin existed equally well as a pure race and as a mixed-race; the Nordic no longer had a pure form and his existence was altogether dependent on the Völker that still bore his blood. To make matters worse for the Nordic twin, his traits seemed to diminish when he mixed with other races whereas the Jewish twin’s traits dominated when he mixed. The Nordic was the frail dying twin, the Jew the robust thriving twin. It was this metaphysical backdrop that set the stage for the intellectual racialist trajectory that the Nordic International was at war with, and simply must triumph over, the degenerative Jewish International. The very existence of the German Volk depended on a Nordic International victory. All would be lost if the Jew triumphed, hence the desire to Nordify the German people who would otherwise continue to be Judaized. Since few Nazi theorists were able to completely disavow this intellectual milieu, Nordicism was able to hang on almost to the bitter end. Even rational Hitler hints at this raciospiritual war in his Platterhof speech.

[1] Christopher M. Hutton, Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, Racial Anthropology and Genetics in the Dialectic of Volk (Malden: MA: Polity Press), p. 20.

[2] Ibid., p. 127.

[3] Ibid., p. 120.

[4] Ibid., p. 151.

[5] Ibid., p. 139.

[6] Ibid., p. 25.

[7] Ibid., p. 163.

[8] Ibid., p. 141.

[9 through 17 not included in this excerpt]

[18] Ibid., p. 60.

Key Notes on Adolf Hitler’s Zionist Collaboration

Did Adolf Hitler “cuck out to”/”cuck for” Zion?

While this proposition is open to debate, depending on one’s definition of “political cuckoldry,” we’ll let the actual facts speak in our behalf. And, fact is, regardless of his personal impetus/motives/reasons for doing so, Adolf Hitler was a willing Founding Father of the Jewish State of Israel.

The Hitler Worship Cult: Distortion, Justification & Mythmaking (Powerwolf Publications) (Volume 13): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1533074763/

Hitler, whether the Alt-Reich/Alt-Right likes it or not, was a Founding Father of the Jewish ethnostate of Israel, which Alt-Right hero-President Donald J. Trump just officially endorsed via his declaration of Jerusalem as the CAPITAL of the Jewish State. The silence of the Hitler Worship Cult (HWC)/Alt-Right community is deafening.

Zionist Jews collaborated with Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP/Foreign Office in forcefully relocating Jews, by hook or by crook, from Europe to Palestine (now Israel). Here’s a synopsis of Klaus Polkehn’s main points in his groundbreaking article, The Secret Contacts – Zionism and Nazi Germany 1933-1941:

The discriminatory [Nazi] round-up of German Jews and their persecution was planned and implemented with the consent and collaboration of Jews who proudly called themselves “Zionist.”
A year and a half after the outbreak of war, January 11, 1941 , the Irgun Zvai Leumi offered an agreement of collaboration with the Third Reich. They said:
“It is often stated in the speeches and utterances of the leaders of Nationalist Socialist Germany that a New Order in Europe requires as a prerequisite the radical solution of the Jewish question through evacuation. (Judesreines Europa)
The solving of the Jewish Problem [Irgun Leumi’s words] and thus the liberation of the Jewish people once and for all [i.e., the “Final Solution”] is the objective of the political activity and the years’ long struggle of the Jewish freedom movement: the National Military Organization [NMO] (Irgun Zvai Leumi) in Palestine.
The NMO, which is well acquainted with the goodwill of the German Reich Government [the Nazi Government] and its authorities towards Zionist activity inside Germany and towards Zionist emigration plans is of the opinion that:
1 . Common interests could exist between the establishment of a new order in Europe in conformity with the German [Nazi] concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as they are embodied by the NMO.
2. Cooperation between the new [Nazi] Germany and a renewed Hebrew nation would be possible.
3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis and bound by a treaty with the [Nazi] German Reich would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.”

Source: https://archive.org/details/TheSecretContacts-ZionismAndNaziGermany1933-1941

Thomas Dalton: Finally, a Correct Interpretation of Hitler’s Racial Views!

My highest compliments to Mr. Dalton. A superb analysis here!

Mr. Dalton’s new dual language translation of Mein Kampf is available on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/0692684158

Racial Theory

Mein Kampf contains numerous references to ‘blood’ (Blut) and ‘race’ (Rasse). This is always portrayed in the worst possible terms, as some kind of demonic, hate-filled, blind racism. But we must first realize that such talk was commonplace in the early 20th Century; Hitler’s terminology, though shocking today, was actually quite conventional at the time. Not being a scientist, and few having much understanding of genetics at the time, it is understandable that he would use such terms.

From “Hitler’s Letters and Notes” by Werner Maser.

Therefore, a literal interpretation of such words is misleading. In modern terminology, Hitler’s ‘race’ is better viewed as ‘ethnicity.’ He was more an ethnicist than a racist. His call for justice for the “German race” is really on behalf of ethnic Germans—the Volk. Thus understood, his view is much less threatening than commonly portrayed. Yes, he viewed ethnic Germans as superior. Yes, he wanted the best for his people. Yes, he was not much interested in the welfare of minorities or other nationalities. This is hardly a sin. Many people around the world today fight for precisely such things, for their own ethnicities. And they are right to do so.

Even today, it is reasonable and appropriate to discuss issues of race. It is a relevant term in biological taxonomy, indicating the highest-level sub-grouping within the species Homo sapiens. By some accounts, there are three races: White/Caucasian, Black/Negroid, and Mongoloid/Asian. Within each race, we have the various ethnicities—of which there are some 5,000 worldwide.

By this measure, Hitler cared little about race. He made a few dismissive comments about Blacks, but nothing that wasn’t standard at the time. He actually admired certain people of the Asian race, especially the Japanese. But his primary concern was among the various White ethnicities. He sought a position of strength and influence for ethnic Germans; he sought alliances with ethnic Britons; and he sought to oppose ethnic Jews.

Then there is Hitler’s infamous talk of ‘Aryan.’ Apart from passing mention elsewhere in the book, it is discussed in detail only in Chapter 11 of Volume 1. While there is no talk of any ‘superman’—no reference to Nietzsche’s Übermensch, for example—it is clear that Hitler views the Aryan as the highest human type, the greatest ethnicity, mover and creator of civilization. Notably, he never defines Aryan. Rather, we learn only what the Aryan is not: he is not Black, not Oriental, and certainly not Jewish. The Jew is the anti-Aryan, his dark and corrupting opposite. The Aryan builds, the Jew destroys. The Aryan produces, the Jew consumes. The Aryan is idealistic, the Jew materialistic.

In the end, the Aryan is distinguished not by his superior intelligence, nor his great creativity, but mainly by his altruism: the Aryan is a self-sacrificing person, more willing than any others to work on behalf of society. Thus he builds civilization and culture, and spreads it to the world. Non-Aryans, to the extent that they have a culture, get it from the Aryans, even as they customize it to their own needs. But the original source and sustainer is the self-sacrificing Aryan.

The word ‘Aryan’ has an interesting origin, and it has nothing to do with the Germans. It comes from the Sanskrit arya, meaning ‘noble.’ It originally referred to the people and language that moved into India from the north around 1500 BC. In the Indian caste system, the Aryans became the Brahmans—the highest and noblest caste. It was they who cultivated the Sanskrit language, and ultimately developed Indian culture. And a final point of interest: Those immigrants from the north came from the region that is known today as the Iranian plateau. In fact, the word ‘Iran’ derives directly from ‘Aryan’; the Iranians were the original Aryans.

Not being a scholar of ancient history, and having no Internet at hand, Hitler knew little of all this. He simply picked up on prior German and European usage. In fact, talk of Aryans as a superior race predated Hitler by several decades. It was a main theme of Frenchman Arthur de Gobineau’s book Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, of 1855. And it was prominent in Briton-turned-German author Houston Stewart Chamberlain’s book Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, published in 1899. By the time Hitler picked up on the term, it was old hat.”

This is almost identical (oxymoron, I know) to what I have written re: Hitler’s race views in my many books addressing this topic, either directly or in passing.

Hitler’s race views by 1944.

Thank you, Mr. Dalton! (Hats off.)

Veronica Clark books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/Veronica-Clark/e/B00310I4S6

V. K. Clark books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/V.-K.-Clark/e/B00K0NY5YY/

Weronika Kuzniar books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/Weronika-Kuzniar/e/B014GA75MA/

J. A. Sexton books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/J.-A.-Sexton/e/B00Q5VKG48


Reinhard Heydrich compared to Turkic Wehrmacht volunteer (note the eyes).

Hitler’s Most Significant Speech – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B07774G7PB/

Or, get it on Audible today: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/B07773D4BS

Hitler’s race views by 1944.

V. K. Clark worked tirelessly on this translation with a female native/fluent German speaker unfamiliar with the politics of the time period for a genuinely fresh, unfettered, layman English version of Hitler’s top secret speech given at Platterhof Hotel.

This audio book edition includes the complete V. K. Clark translation (2014-15), the complete Wilf Heink translation (2009-10), as well as the mini-biographies and Ms. Clark’s supplementary, introductory and contextual material from the original softcover release of 2009, which is OOP.

Raw evil and hatred like you have never encountered? (You decide.) — and straight from the “madman’s” own mouth!

Limited edition softcover: https://amazon.com/dp/1507618654/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Managing Our Perception of the Third Reich – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B076ZWFH49/

Or, get it on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/Managing-Our-Perception-of-the-Third-Reich-Audiobook/B076ZR7KGC/

University professors, white nationalists, Liberals, MGTOW, Brits, Anglo-Americans and Zionists alike all have a stake in managing the world’s perception of Nazi Germany and World War II.


What are they trying to hide and why do they go to such extremes, including serial harassment and cyberbullying, to control and micromanage the narrative for the rest of us?

This concentrated analysis of the World War II and postwar narrative by author Weronika Kuzniar answers these questions and many more in a relaxed, reader-friendly style.

On Amazon (2nd ed. softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/1545442347/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Hitler’s Most Significant Speech – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B07774G7PB/

Or, get it on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/B07773D4BS

On Amazon (collectible softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/1507618654/

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 10

Copyright©2017. Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

In our tenth podcast, John and I discuss “Black Nazis”. We delve into Black Nazi collaborators, African POW survivors, and mulatto assimilation via military service under the Nazis. We also reveal the American origin of the phrase “BLACK NAZIS” as well as the identity of the mysterious Nazi recruiter in East Africa, Fritz Delfs. But not to worry, trendies…we talk about the “Black Nazis” of today too! Have a listen as we send Hitler worshipers and Nazi-bashers alike into a tailspin with unparalleled, fact-based analysis. You’ll learn something!

The African American member of Special Commando Wimmer “Sam”.
An unidentified Black man in German Army uniform.
Louis Joachim Eugene (left) and Norbert Desiree (middle).
BLACK NAZIS as featured in KEN magazine in March 1939.

You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 10 – 11/05/2017

Music by Heimatærde & E Nomine.

“Hitler’s” Table Talk? – Now on Audio Book!

NOW ON AMAZON: https://amazon.com/dp/B076FDPHFN/

Or, get it on Audible: https://www.audible.com/pd/History/Hitlers-Table-Talk-A-Study-in-Academic-Fraud-Scandal-Audiobook/B076FHVZF7

On Amazon (1st ed. softcover): https://amazon.com/dp/1548258768

Please consider leaving a positive review on Amazon if you enjoyed this book. We NEED and APPRECIATE your support. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 9

Copyright©2017. Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

In our ninth podcast, John and I discuss the “Hitler was always preemptive” thesis–i.e., that Britain initiated all hostilities against Germany and not vice versa–as well as more on the recent Las Vegas shooting/non-shooting. We also look into the suspected murder of Heinrich Himmler and the most likely motive for his murder by the Brits. Have a listen as we send Hitler worshipers and Nazi-bashers alike into a tailspin with pure, unadulterated evidence. You’ll love it!

Israeli Kristallnacht: Africans attacked in Tel Aviv anti-migrant demo (PHOTOS): https://www.rt.com/news/israel-anti-migrant-demo-061/

The confession of Franz Ziereis, commandant of Mauthausen: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/the-confession-of-frank-ziereis-commandant-of-mauthausen/

Franz Ziereis is deceased in this disgusting Allied photo op.

The Norfolk Four: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/norfolk-four-pardoned-20-years-after-false-confessions/

FRONTLINE: The Confessions: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/the-confessions/

ASEXUAL AGENDA’s interview with Aqua-Ace (Russian): https://asexualagenda.wordpress.com/2014/02/15/a-story-from-the-antisexual-community-an-interview-with-aqua-ace/

Medical Historian Examines NIMH Experiments in Crowding: https://nihrecord.nih.gov/newsletters/2008/07_25_2008/story1.htm

You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 9 – 10/15/2017

Music by Heimatærde & E Nomine.

Netanyahu’s revisionism consistent with Zionism’s collaboration with Hitler

Food for thought…

by Daniel Margrain | October 25, 2015

Angela Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert last week confirmed what everybody except neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers and neoZionists like Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu have long understood when he said that the “responsibility for the Holocaust lay with the Germans.” Netanyahu’s offensive and slanderous contrarian view made during an address to the 37th Zionist Congress, came after a day of violence that saw five Palestinians, including alleged attackers, killed in the occupied territories and an Israeli killed in a traffic incident in the West Bank.

In his speech, Netanyahu focused on incitement, saying Palestinian incitement could be traced back to before the creation of the Israeli state, and claimed that a Palestinian religious leader had encouraged Adolf Hitler to carry out the Holocaust. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, “flew to Berlin,” Netanyahu said. “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.” “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here.’ ‘So what should I do with them?’ he asked. He said, ‘Burn them.”

However, contrary to Netanyahu’s account, there is not a single reference in the entire text of the official record of the conversation between Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin al-Husseini to “Jew burning”. The fact that most Holocaust scholars insist the first death camps were formed before the 1941 meeting between Husseini and Hitler would seem to suggest that Hitler’s plan was already in place by the time they met.

But just as significant, Netanyahu’s lies underscore the secret history that ideologically links Zionism to Hitler fascism. This includes outright collaborations with the Nazis predicated on the notion that the formation of a Zionist state would be part of the system of colonial domination of the rest of the world.

In setting out the Zionist programme, the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl in a 1896 pamphlet called The State of the Jews, called for a Jewish state to be set up in an under developed country outside Europe with the backing of one of the major imperialist powers in order to support the former’s colonizing of it. To achieve this aim the Zionists aligned themselves with notorious anti-Semites that included Count Von Plehve, the sponsor of the worst anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia.

In 1933, The Zionist Federation of Germany sent a memorandum of support to the Nazis and later that year the World Zionist Organization congress defeated a resolution for action against Hitler by a vote of 240 to 43. The author Ralph Schoenman notes in the Hidden History of Zionism:

“Throughout the late thirties and forties, Jewish spokespersons in Europe cried out for help, for public campaigns, for organized resistance, for demonstrations to force the hand of the allied governments – only to be met not merely by Zionist silence but by active Zionist sabotage of the meager efforts which were proposed or prepared in Great Britain and the United States.”

The dirty secret of Zionist history is that Zionism was threatened by the Jews themselves. Defending the Jewish people from persecution meant organizing resistance to the regimes that menaced them. But these regimes embodied the imperial order which comprised the only social force willing or able to impose a settler colony on the Palestinian people. Hence, the Zionists needed the persecution of the Jews to persuade Jews to become colonizers afar, and they needed the persecutors to sponsor the enterprise.

Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first leader, wasn’t satisfied with the arrangement that followed the 1947 partition of the country into separate Jewish and Palestinian states by the leading imperial powers. This was despite the fact that the Jews comprised just 31 per cent of the population but had been given 54 per cent of the fertile land. The end goal for Ben-Gurion and the Zionists was the aspiration towards the establishment of Eretz Yisrael (Greater Israel) – a fascistic concept no different in principle to the aims of the Nazis.

The Zionist project could only be completed if the Palestinians were expelled from their historical homeland. In 1948 this policy was put into effect. Just as Ben-Gurion needed the persecution of the Jews in order to justify his colonization of a foreign land, Netanyahu needs to persuade modern day Israeli Jews of the racist revisionist myth that rejects Hitler’s main responsibility for the Holocaust.

Neo-nazi Andrew Anglin on Israeli television (2017).

Netanyahu’s outrageous speech effectively lets Hitler off the hook with the aim of putting the blame for the suffering of the Jews and Hitler’s Final Solution on the shoulders of the Palestinian people so as to self-justify his continued obliteration of them.

When in 2005 Iran’s former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, allegedly denied the Holocaust, there was legitimate uproar and worldwide condemnation and media saturation coverage of his comments. This is in sharp contrast to the lack of mainstream media coverage following Netanyahu’s remarks that were no less offensive and outrageous.

Given that Netanyahu underplayed the role Hitler played in the Holocaust, neither he, nor his fellow Jewish extremist fundamentalists, have any wriggle room with which to critique, with any credibility, Holocaust deniers ever again.

Source: https://bsnews.info/netanyahus-holocaust-revisionism-is-consistent-with-zionisms-collaboration-with-hitler/

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 5

Copyright©2017. Wilk Mocy Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

In our fifth podcast, John and I discuss several aspects of World War II, including Hitler’s invasion of Poland (Schultze-Rhonhof vs. Dieter-Müller) and Stalin’s offensive plan against Eastern Europe/Poland (the Pleshakov thesis). We also cover a range of sociopolitical topics and current events, from the Anglin-Gab fiasco to Alex Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory (yes, again!). Loaded with unsurpassed analysis, this episode is certainly not lacking in entertainment value. Have a listen.

You can help support this podcast with just one dollar a month. Please visit our About page for details. Thank you!

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 5(1) – 09/06/2017

Gen-X FashyCast w/Johnny & Ronnie – Episode 5(2) – 09/06/2017

Music by Heimatærde.


WORLD FREEMASONRY UNVEILED audio book now available: https://amazon.com/dp/B072LVMKJZ/

What is Freemasonry and what are its goals?

Most of us have been taught that Freemasonry is just a philanthropic organization dedicated to helping advance the interests of mankind in a positive direction. But if this is true, then why is Freemasonry a secret society? Why do the brethren conduct their business behind lock and key? Why do they refer to non-Masons as “profane”? Why do they discriminate against women? And why are Masons so prevalent in government, finance, the military and business?

This rare and original Third Reich publication answers these questions, and so many more, concisely and simply. If you want to know why the world exists as it does, and why politics is the way it is, then you must read this booklet!!

You may also get our fully revised, reformatted & updated Wilk Mocy printing of “WORLD FREEMASONRY UNVEILED” in softcover on Amazon: https://amazon.com/dp/1546522646/.

Or, get the first edition: https://amazon.com/dp/1482748967/

#WhyTheHateWhen HeGaveYouYourState?

Some folks are under the impression that the commemorative token about a Nazi who traveled to Palestine in behalf of Zionism is a fake.

Mark Weber, David Irving, Lenni Brenner, and the USHMM have all attested to its authenticity.

Excerpt from “The Secret Contacts: Zionism and Nazi Germany, 1933-1941” by Klaus Polkehn.

The article series that appeared in Dr. Goebbels’ “Der Angriff” used the term “NAZI”. Goebbels himself was not averse to using the term “NAZI” to describe National Socialism if it suited his propaganda purposes. (E.g., his pamphlet “Der Nazi-Sozi”; see images below).

1934 EIN NAZI FÄHRT NACH PALÄSTINA (A Nazi Travels to Palestine) UND ERZÄHLT DAVON IM Angriff (And tells about it in Angriff). Medal by Lauer of Nuremberg.

Here are a few relevant links–
USHMM: https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn517746
David Irving’s FPP: http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/09/07/Nazi_Zionism.html
Lenni Brenner on the coin: http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/articles/article0062443.html